My Law Tutor

The Super Servant Two [1990]

April 15, 2024

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Introduction to The Super Servant Two [1990]

The Super Servant Two (1990) stands as a significant case in contract law, clarifying the boundaries of a party’s duty of care and the concept of contract frustration. This case study delves into the factual background, legal issues at stake, the court’s decision, and its lasting impact.

Factual Background

Lauritzen contracted with Wijsmuller to transport a drilling rig using a specific vessel, the Super Servant Two. The contract included a duty of care clause in Lauritzen’s favor. Unfortunately, the Super Servant Two sank before the transportation was to begin. Wijsmuller offered an alternative vessel (Super Servant One) but claimed it was unavailable. Lauritzen secured alternative transportation at a higher cost and sued Wijsmuller for breach of contract.

Legal Issues

Two key issues arose:

  1. Duty of Care: Did the duty of care clause extend to events before the contract’s performance (i.e., the sinking)?
  2. Frustration: Did the sinking of the Super Servant Two fundamentally change the contract, relieving Wijsmuller of its obligations?

Holding and Reasoning

The court sided with Lauritzen on both points. The court interpreted the duty of care clause broadly, holding Wijsmuller responsible for acting reasonably throughout the contractual period, including pre-performance actions. Regarding frustration, the court reasoned that the contract anticipated the possibility of the designated vessel being unavailable and provided for an alternative. Therefore, the sinking did not fundamentally change the contract’s performance.

Significance

The Super Servant Two clarifies aspects of duty of care and frustration:

  • Duty of Care: The case emphasizes that the scope of a duty of care clause can extend beyond the immediate performance, potentially encompassing pre-performance actions.
  • Frustration: The case clarifies that frustration requires a fundamental change in the agreed-upon performance, not just inconvenience or additional costs.

Conclusion

The Super Servant Two remains a vital case, shaping how courts perceive duty of care and the threshold for contract frustration.

Why Choose Us:

Students rely on our team of Professional Literature Review Writers for their expertise and proficiency in conducting literature reviews across various disciplines. With advanced degrees and extensive experience in academic writing, our writers possess the skills and knowledge to deliver high-quality literature reviews that demonstrate thorough research and critical analysis.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'The Super Servant Two [1990]' (Mylawtutor.net, ) <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990> accessed 15 June 2026
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). The Super Servant Two [1990]. Retrieved from https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990
"The Super Servant Two [1990]." MyLawTutor.net. . All Answers Ltd. 06 2026 <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990>.
"The Super Servant Two [1990]." MyLawTutor. MyLawTutor.net, . Web. 15 June 2026. <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990>.
MyLawTutor. . The Super Servant Two [1990]. [online]. Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990 [Accessed 15 June 2026].
MyLawTutor. The Super Servant Two [1990] [Internet]. . [Accessed 15 June 2026]; Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990.
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url=https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990 |title=The Super Servant Two [1990] |publisher=MyLawTutor.net |date= |accessdate=15 June 2026 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Owens v Brimmell – 1977

UK Law . Last modified: July 24, 2024

Introduction to Owens v Brimmell: Owens v Brimmell (1977) stands as a pivotal case in the realm of tort law, offering significant insights into the principles of negligence and duty of care. This case study aims to delve into the intricacies of Owens v Brimmell, exploring its background, legal issues, court proceedings, judgment, impact, controversies, […]

Nickerson v Barraclough [1981]

UK Law . Last modified: July 24, 2024

Introduction to Nickerson v Barraclough [1981] Nickerson v Barraclough [1981] Ch 426 is a leading English land law case concerning easements, necessity, and implied grants. This case study delves into the complexities of landlocked property, access rights, and the limitations of the way of necessity doctrine. Facts The case centered on a dispute over access […]

Bailey v Stephens – 1862

UK Law . Last modified: September 30, 2024

 Introduction to Bailey v Stephens – 1862 Property law often delves into the complexities of ownership and usage rights. Easements, a specific type of right, allow one property owner (dominant tenement) to utilize another’s property (servient tenement) in a limited way. Bailey v Stephens (1862), a case decided by the English High Court (Queen’s […]

R v Ghosh – 1982

UK Law . Last modified: July 24, 2024

 Introduction to R v Ghosh: R v Ghosh (1982) stands as a seminal case within the annals of criminal law, its significance reverberating through legal precedents and judicial interpretation. This case study aims to dissect its intricacies, delving into its background, procedural history, legal analysis, and lasting impact. Background At its core, R v […]

Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company Limited

UK Law . Last modified: July 24, 2024

Introduction to Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company Limited Young v Bristol Aeroplane Company Limited stands as a significant legal episode, unraveling complexities within the framework of legal disputes. In this exploration, we delve into the essence of the case, identify the involved parties, and establish a timeline of pertinent events leading to the legal confrontation. […]

AG Securities v Vaughan – 1990

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to AG Securities v Vaughan: AG Securities v Vaughan – 1990 involved a legal dispute between AG Securities, a company, and Vaughan, an individual. The significance of this case stemmed from its potential impact on establishing legal guidelines pertinent to their disagreement. This lawsuit’s outcome was pivotal, as it had the potential to set […]

go to top