The Super Servant Two [1990]

April 15, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s):

Introduction to The Super Servant Two [1990]

The Super Servant Two (1990) stands as a significant case in contract law, clarifying the boundaries of a party’s duty of care and the concept of contract frustration. This case study delves into the factual background, legal issues at stake, the court’s decision, and its lasting impact.

Factual Background

Lauritzen contracted with Wijsmuller to transport a drilling rig using a specific vessel, the Super Servant Two. The contract included a duty of care clause in Lauritzen’s favor. Unfortunately, the Super Servant Two sank before the transportation was to begin. Wijsmuller offered an alternative vessel (Super Servant One) but claimed it was unavailable. Lauritzen secured alternative transportation at a higher cost and sued Wijsmuller for breach of contract.

Legal Issues

Two key issues arose:

  1. Duty of Care: Did the duty of care clause extend to events before the contract’s performance (i.e., the sinking)?
  2. Frustration: Did the sinking of the Super Servant Two fundamentally change the contract, relieving Wijsmuller of its obligations?

Holding and Reasoning

The court sided with Lauritzen on both points. The court interpreted the duty of care clause broadly, holding Wijsmuller responsible for acting reasonably throughout the contractual period, including pre-performance actions. Regarding frustration, the court reasoned that the contract anticipated the possibility of the designated vessel being unavailable and provided for an alternative. Therefore, the sinking did not fundamentally change the contract’s performance.

Significance

The Super Servant Two clarifies aspects of duty of care and frustration:

  • Duty of Care: The case emphasizes that the scope of a duty of care clause can extend beyond the immediate performance, potentially encompassing pre-performance actions.
  • Frustration: The case clarifies that frustration requires a fundamental change in the agreed-upon performance, not just inconvenience or additional costs.

Conclusion

The Super Servant Two remains a vital case, shaping how courts perceive duty of care and the threshold for contract frustration.

Why Choose Us:

Students rely on our team of Professional Literature Review Writers for their expertise and proficiency in conducting literature reviews across various disciplines. With advanced degrees and extensive experience in academic writing, our writers possess the skills and knowledge to deliver high-quality literature reviews that demonstrate thorough research and critical analysis.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'The Super Servant Two [1990]' (Mylawtutor.net, September 2012 ) <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990> accessed 26 May 2024
My, Law, Tutor. (September 2012 ). The Super Servant Two [1990]. Retrieved from https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990
"The Super Servant Two [1990]." MyLawTutor.net. 9 2012. All Answers Ltd. 05 2024 <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990>.
"The Super Servant Two [1990]." MyLawTutor. MyLawTutor.net, September 2012. Web. 26 May 2024. <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990>.
MyLawTutor. September 2012. The Super Servant Two [1990]. [online]. Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990 [Accessed 26 May 2024].
MyLawTutor. The Super Servant Two [1990] [Internet]. September 2012. [Accessed 26 May 2024]; Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990.
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url=https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990 |title=The Super Servant Two [1990] |publisher=MyLawTutor.net |date=September 2012 |accessdate=26 May 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Dick Bentley v Harold Smith

. Last modified: May 20, 2024

 Introduction to Dick Bentley v Harold Smith The world of contracts can be a complex one, especially when it comes to the interpretation of statements made during negotiations. Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] stands as a significant case in English contract law, offering valuable insights into the distinction between […]

Performance Cars v Abraham

. Last modified: April 26, 2024

Introduction to Performance Cars v Abraham Performance Cars Ltd v Abraham (1962) stands as a landmark case in English tort law, specifically regarding the concept of causation in negligence claims. This case study delves into the factual background, the legal issue at stake, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the lasting impact of the case […]

R v Hennessy – 1989

. Last modified: April 26, 2024

Introduction to R v Hennessy – 1989 The criminal justice system grapples with complex issues when a defendant’s actions seem involuntary due to a medical condition. R v Hennessy (1989) stands as a significant case in English law, delving into the boundaries of the defense of automatism in the context of diabetic hypoglycemia. This case […]

go to top