My Law Tutor

The Super Servant Two [1990]

April 15, 2024

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Introduction to The Super Servant Two [1990]

The Super Servant Two (1990) stands as a significant case in contract law, clarifying the boundaries of a party’s duty of care and the concept of contract frustration. This case study delves into the factual background, legal issues at stake, the court’s decision, and its lasting impact.

Factual Background

Lauritzen contracted with Wijsmuller to transport a drilling rig using a specific vessel, the Super Servant Two. The contract included a duty of care clause in Lauritzen’s favor. Unfortunately, the Super Servant Two sank before the transportation was to begin. Wijsmuller offered an alternative vessel (Super Servant One) but claimed it was unavailable. Lauritzen secured alternative transportation at a higher cost and sued Wijsmuller for breach of contract.

Legal Issues

Two key issues arose:

  1. Duty of Care: Did the duty of care clause extend to events before the contract’s performance (i.e., the sinking)?
  2. Frustration: Did the sinking of the Super Servant Two fundamentally change the contract, relieving Wijsmuller of its obligations?

Holding and Reasoning

The court sided with Lauritzen on both points. The court interpreted the duty of care clause broadly, holding Wijsmuller responsible for acting reasonably throughout the contractual period, including pre-performance actions. Regarding frustration, the court reasoned that the contract anticipated the possibility of the designated vessel being unavailable and provided for an alternative. Therefore, the sinking did not fundamentally change the contract’s performance.

Significance

The Super Servant Two clarifies aspects of duty of care and frustration:

  • Duty of Care: The case emphasizes that the scope of a duty of care clause can extend beyond the immediate performance, potentially encompassing pre-performance actions.
  • Frustration: The case clarifies that frustration requires a fundamental change in the agreed-upon performance, not just inconvenience or additional costs.

Conclusion

The Super Servant Two remains a vital case, shaping how courts perceive duty of care and the threshold for contract frustration.

Why Choose Us:

Students rely on our team of Professional Literature Review Writers for their expertise and proficiency in conducting literature reviews across various disciplines. With advanced degrees and extensive experience in academic writing, our writers possess the skills and knowledge to deliver high-quality literature reviews that demonstrate thorough research and critical analysis.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'The Super Servant Two [1990]' (Mylawtutor.net, ) <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990> accessed 26 September 2026
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). The Super Servant Two [1990]. Retrieved from https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990
"The Super Servant Two [1990]." MyLawTutor.net. . All Answers Ltd. 09 2026 <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990>.
"The Super Servant Two [1990]." MyLawTutor. MyLawTutor.net, . Web. 26 September 2026. <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990>.
MyLawTutor. . The Super Servant Two [1990]. [online]. Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990 [Accessed 26 September 2026].
MyLawTutor. The Super Servant Two [1990] [Internet]. . [Accessed 26 September 2026]; Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990.
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url=https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990 |title=The Super Servant Two [1990] |publisher=MyLawTutor.net |date= |accessdate=26 September 2026 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

R v Latimer – 1886

UK Law . Last modified: July 24, 2024

Introduction to R v Latimer: R v Latimer (1886) is a landmark case in criminal law that deals with the concept of transferred malice. This case study aims to provide an in-depth analysis of R v Latimer, including its background, legal issues, court proceedings, judgment, impact, controversies, and significance within criminal law jurisprudence. Background: R […]

Greatorex v Greatorex

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Greatorex v Greatorex: Greatorex v Greatorex presents a compelling case study in family law, exploring the complexities of familial relationships and legal disputes. This case study delves into the intricacies of Greatorex v Greatorex, shedding light on its background, legal issues, court proceedings, judgment, and its significance in shaping family law jurisprudence. Background: […]

R v Bateman – Case Summary

UK Law . Last modified: September 30, 2024

 Introduction to R v Bateman – Case Summary R v Bateman is a significant case in legal jurisprudence, revolving around criminal proceedings against the defendant, Bateman. This case study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the legal proceedings, examining the background, facts of the case, legal issues, court proceedings, precedent, and overall significance […]

Hodgson v Marks

UK Law . Last modified: July 22, 2024

Introduction to Hodgson v Marks Hodgson v Marks, a legal milestone, emerged in the late 20th century, tackling pivotal issues within a specific legal framework. As we delve into this case, it’s essential to grasp its historical context. The case’s legal significance lies in its ability to shape subsequent legal discourse, making it a crucial […]

Sweet v Parsley – 1970

UK Law . Last modified: July 24, 2024

Introduction to Sweet v Parsley – 1970 Sweet v Parsley – 1970 is a legal milestone that unfolded in the intricate tapestry of judicial history. This case, while seeming complex, can be broken down into a comprehensible narrative. Imagine a legal tale where key players and pivotal events set the stage for a significant legal […]

Cambridge Water v Eastern Countries Leather Plc

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Cambridge Water v Eastern Countries Leather Plc: The case of Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather Plc is a landmark legal dispute that holds significant importance in environmental law. Heard in the High Court of Justice in England, this case revolves around environmental contamination and the liability of industrial entities for water pollution. […]

go to top