My Law Tutor

The Super Servant Two [1990]

April 15, 2024

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Introduction to The Super Servant Two [1990]

The Super Servant Two (1990) stands as a significant case in contract law, clarifying the boundaries of a party’s duty of care and the concept of contract frustration. This case study delves into the factual background, legal issues at stake, the court’s decision, and its lasting impact.

Factual Background

Lauritzen contracted with Wijsmuller to transport a drilling rig using a specific vessel, the Super Servant Two. The contract included a duty of care clause in Lauritzen’s favor. Unfortunately, the Super Servant Two sank before the transportation was to begin. Wijsmuller offered an alternative vessel (Super Servant One) but claimed it was unavailable. Lauritzen secured alternative transportation at a higher cost and sued Wijsmuller for breach of contract.

Legal Issues

Two key issues arose:

  1. Duty of Care: Did the duty of care clause extend to events before the contract’s performance (i.e., the sinking)?
  2. Frustration: Did the sinking of the Super Servant Two fundamentally change the contract, relieving Wijsmuller of its obligations?

Holding and Reasoning

The court sided with Lauritzen on both points. The court interpreted the duty of care clause broadly, holding Wijsmuller responsible for acting reasonably throughout the contractual period, including pre-performance actions. Regarding frustration, the court reasoned that the contract anticipated the possibility of the designated vessel being unavailable and provided for an alternative. Therefore, the sinking did not fundamentally change the contract’s performance.

Significance

The Super Servant Two clarifies aspects of duty of care and frustration:

  • Duty of Care: The case emphasizes that the scope of a duty of care clause can extend beyond the immediate performance, potentially encompassing pre-performance actions.
  • Frustration: The case clarifies that frustration requires a fundamental change in the agreed-upon performance, not just inconvenience or additional costs.

Conclusion

The Super Servant Two remains a vital case, shaping how courts perceive duty of care and the threshold for contract frustration.

Why Choose Us:

Students rely on our team of Professional Literature Review Writers for their expertise and proficiency in conducting literature reviews across various disciplines. With advanced degrees and extensive experience in academic writing, our writers possess the skills and knowledge to deliver high-quality literature reviews that demonstrate thorough research and critical analysis.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'The Super Servant Two [1990]' (Mylawtutor.net, ) <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990> accessed 15 June 2026
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). The Super Servant Two [1990]. Retrieved from https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990
"The Super Servant Two [1990]." MyLawTutor.net. . All Answers Ltd. 06 2026 <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990>.
"The Super Servant Two [1990]." MyLawTutor. MyLawTutor.net, . Web. 15 June 2026. <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990>.
MyLawTutor. . The Super Servant Two [1990]. [online]. Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990 [Accessed 15 June 2026].
MyLawTutor. The Super Servant Two [1990] [Internet]. . [Accessed 15 June 2026]; Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990.
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url=https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/the-super-servant-two-1990 |title=The Super Servant Two [1990] |publisher=MyLawTutor.net |date= |accessdate=15 June 2026 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Thorner v Major 2009

UK Law . Last modified: July 24, 2024

Introduction to Thorner v Major 2009 “Thorner v Major 2009” holds significant importance in property law, focusing on the establishment of property rights based on assurances and conduct. This case is notable for its exploration of proprietary estoppel, a legal principle concerning promises or assurances leading to expectations and rights in property, even without a […]

Caparo v Dickman Case Summary

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Caparo v Dickman In the Caparo v Dickman case, Caparo Industries plc brought a lawsuit against their auditors, Dickman, alleging negligence in financial reports. The case became significant in defining the duty of care in negligence and had a profound impact on the field of tort law. This case played a crucial role […]

Lowery v Walker – 1911

UK Law . Last modified: July 24, 2024

Introduction to Lowery v Walker: Lowery v Walker (1911) is a seminal case that delves into the complexities of property law, particularly in relation to the principles of adverse possession. This case study aims to dissect the intricacies of Lowery v Walker, exploring its background, legal issues, court proceedings, judgment, impact, controversies, and significance within […]

R v Allen

UK Law . Last modified: July 24, 2024

Introduction to R v Allen R v Allen stands as a pivotal legal case involving a dispute between the prosecution, referred to as “the Crown,” and the accused, Mr. Allen. The case bears substantial importance due to its pivotal role in elucidating legal intricacies and the judicial process. It serves as an educational tool, offering […]

McCutheon v David MacBrayne Ltd – 1964

UK Law . Last modified: July 24, 2024

Introduction to McCutheon v David MacBrayne Ltd: McCutcheon v David MacBrayne Ltd – 1964 is a significant case that delves into maritime law, specifically addressing issues of duty of care and negligence. This case study provides a detailed analysis of McCutcheon v David MacBrayne Ltd – 1964, exploring its background, legal issues, court proceedings, judgment, […]

Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance Co – 1954

UK Law . Last modified: July 22, 2024

Introduction to Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance Co – 1954: Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance Co 1954 is a notable case that delves into the complexities of insurance contracts and the legal implications of misrepresentation. The case involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Houghton, and the defendant, Trafalgar Insurance Co, concerning allegations of misrepresentation in an […]

go to top