My Law Tutor

Combe v Combe – 1951

January 02, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Introduction to Combe v Combe – 1951

Combe v Combe – 1951 presented a significant legal scenario regarding promises made within a marital relationship and their enforceability in court. It addressed the intricate intersection of family promises and contract law, aiming to determine whether such promises could legally bind parties or if they lacked the essential elements to be considered as enforceable contracts. The case served as a pivotal exploration into the application of legal principles in family-related assurances and their status as legally binding contracts.

Case Facts and Circumstances

In this case, Mr. Combe, during the breakdown of his marriage, assured his former wife of providing financial support beyond their divorce. However, when the ex-wife sought legal recourse to enforce this promise, Mr. Combe contested its enforceability, stating that the promise lacked legal consideration and was unenforceable as a contract. This scenario raised fundamental questions concerning the enforceability of promises made in a family setting and whether such assurances held legal weight within the context of contractual obligations. Examining the specific events and the legal issues arising from them is crucial to comprehend the complexities involved in Combe v Combe – 1951.

Doctrine of Consideration in Contract Law

The case hinged on the doctrine of consideration in contract law. Consideration refers to something of value exchanged between parties in a contract, forming the basis for the agreement’s enforceability. In Combe v Combe, the court scrutinized whether the promise made by Mr. Combe to his former wife had sufficient legal consideration to transform it into a binding contract. It led to a deeper exploration of the elements necessary for an agreement to be recognized as a valid contract, especially when considering promises made within family relationships where legal consideration might not align with traditional contractual concepts.

Impact on Contract Law and Promissory Estoppel

Combe v Combe – 1951 made significant contributions to contract law, particularly in understanding the implications of promises made in familial relationships. The case illuminated the complexities of applying traditional contract law principles within family contexts, shedding light on the limitations of contractual enforcement in such scenarios. Additionally, it prompted considerations of promissory estoppel, a doctrine that prevents a party from going back on a promise, even if it lacks the elements of a formal contract. This case’s impact reverberated through legal discussions, influencing future interpretations regarding promises made within the dynamics of family relations and their enforceability.

Legal Principles and Precedents

This section involves examining established legal principles and prior judgments that the court considered in Combe v Combe. It focuses on the precedents and established doctrines in contract law and family-related assurances, offering insights into how the court arrived at its decision. The case drew upon various legal principles, analyzing their application in familial promises and their alignment with traditional contract law doctrines.

Arguments Presented

Combe v Combe involved arguments from both parties, each presenting their stance regarding the enforceability of the promise made between husband and wife. The wife argued that the promise had created a legal obligation, while the husband contended that it lacked the necessary elements to be considered a binding contract. The evaluation of these arguments offered a comprehensive view of the legal reasoning and perspectives surrounding the case, contributing to the court’s decision.

Court Proceedings and Decision

The court proceedings in Combe v Combe encompassed a thorough analysis of evidence, legal arguments, and precedents. The court deliberated on whether the promise made by Mr. Combe to provide financial support to his ex-wife after divorce could be legally enforced. The final decision rested on the court’s interpretation of the promise and its consideration under contract law principles, leading to implications for similar cases involving familial assurances and contractual obligations.


In conclusion, Combe v Combe – 1951 represents a pivotal legal case that traversed the intricate interplay between familial assurances and contract law. The case highlighted the complexities inherent in enforcing promises made within family relationships as legally binding contracts. It underscored the challenges of applying traditional contract law doctrines, notably the doctrine of consideration, to promises made in the domestic sphere, shedding light on the limitations of contractual enforceability in such contexts.

Why Choose Us:

Our professional literature review writers craft personalized literature reviews tailored to your specific requirements. By conducting thorough research and employing expertise, we create custom literature reviews that align with your topic, ensuring in-depth analysis, proper citation, and adherence to academic standards for a comprehensive and unique review.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Combe v Combe – 1951' (, ) <> accessed 24 July 2024
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). Combe v Combe – 1951. Retrieved from
"Combe v Combe – 1951." . All Answers Ltd. 07 2024 <>.
"Combe v Combe – 1951." MyLawTutor., . Web. 24 July 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. . Combe v Combe – 1951. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 24 July 2024].
MyLawTutor. Combe v Combe – 1951 [Internet]. . [Accessed 24 July 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Combe v Combe – 1951 | |date= |accessdate=24 July 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

R v Robinson – 1977

UK Law . Last modified: April 3, 2024

Introduction to R v Robinson – 1977 Theft, a seemingly straightforward crime, takes a nuanced turn in R v Robinson (1977). This case explores the scenario where a defendant uses force to acquire property, but believes they have a legal right to do so. The central question revolves around the concept of “dishonesty,” a crucial […]

Abbey National Building Society v Cann

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Abbey National Building Society v Cann Abbey National Building Society v Cann is a legal case that involves a dispute between Abbey National, a major financial institution, and Mr. and Mrs. Cann, borrowers in a mortgage agreement. This case centers on disagreements related to a mortgage contract and the property linked to it. […]

Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway

UK Law . Last modified: March 28, 2024

Introduction to Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway: Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway is a landmark case that explores the legal principles surrounding employer’s liability and negligence in the context of workplace safety. This case study provides a comprehensive analysis of the factual background, legal issues, court proceedings, and judgment of Thompson […]

Tweddle v Atkinson – 1861

UK Law . Last modified: January 10, 2024

Introduction to Tweddle v Atkinson – 1861 “Tweddle v Atkinson – 1861” is a crucial case that shaped contract law principles. It involves two individuals, Tweddle and Atkinson, whose children were to marry. Prior to the wedding, both fathers agreed in a written contract to provide a sum of money to the newlyweds. Sadly, before […]

The Super Servant Two [1990]

UK Law . Last modified: July 10, 2024

 Introduction to The Super Servant Two [1990] The Super Servant Two (1990) stands as a significant case in contract law, clarifying the boundaries of a party’s duty of care and the concept of contract frustration. This case study delves into the factual background, legal issues at stake, the court’s decision, and its lasting impact. […]

Jones v Padavatton – 1969

UK Law . Last modified: February 26, 2024

Introduction to Jones v Padavatton – 1969: Jones v Padavatton (1969) stands as a pivotal case in family law, unraveling complex issues arising from an international relationship. Tvhe dispute, involving Elizabeth Jones and Saranjit Padavatton, delves into the intricacies of cultural diversity, legal complexities, and the welfare of a child caught in the crossfire. The […]

go to top