Combe v Combe – 1951

January 02, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s):

Introduction to Combe v Combe – 1951

Combe v Combe – 1951 presented a significant legal scenario regarding promises made within a marital relationship and their enforceability in court. It addressed the intricate intersection of family promises and contract law, aiming to determine whether such promises could legally bind parties or if they lacked the essential elements to be considered as enforceable contracts. The case served as a pivotal exploration into the application of legal principles in family-related assurances and their status as legally binding contracts.

Case Facts and Circumstances

In this case, Mr. Combe, during the breakdown of his marriage, assured his former wife of providing financial support beyond their divorce. However, when the ex-wife sought legal recourse to enforce this promise, Mr. Combe contested its enforceability, stating that the promise lacked legal consideration and was unenforceable as a contract. This scenario raised fundamental questions concerning the enforceability of promises made in a family setting and whether such assurances held legal weight within the context of contractual obligations. Examining the specific events and the legal issues arising from them is crucial to comprehend the complexities involved in Combe v Combe – 1951.

Doctrine of Consideration in Contract Law

The case hinged on the doctrine of consideration in contract law. Consideration refers to something of value exchanged between parties in a contract, forming the basis for the agreement’s enforceability. In Combe v Combe, the court scrutinized whether the promise made by Mr. Combe to his former wife had sufficient legal consideration to transform it into a binding contract. It led to a deeper exploration of the elements necessary for an agreement to be recognized as a valid contract, especially when considering promises made within family relationships where legal consideration might not align with traditional contractual concepts.

Impact on Contract Law and Promissory Estoppel

Combe v Combe – 1951 made significant contributions to contract law, particularly in understanding the implications of promises made in familial relationships. The case illuminated the complexities of applying traditional contract law principles within family contexts, shedding light on the limitations of contractual enforcement in such scenarios. Additionally, it prompted considerations of promissory estoppel, a doctrine that prevents a party from going back on a promise, even if it lacks the elements of a formal contract. This case’s impact reverberated through legal discussions, influencing future interpretations regarding promises made within the dynamics of family relations and their enforceability.

Legal Principles and Precedents

This section involves examining established legal principles and prior judgments that the court considered in Combe v Combe. It focuses on the precedents and established doctrines in contract law and family-related assurances, offering insights into how the court arrived at its decision. The case drew upon various legal principles, analyzing their application in familial promises and their alignment with traditional contract law doctrines.

Arguments Presented

Combe v Combe involved arguments from both parties, each presenting their stance regarding the enforceability of the promise made between husband and wife. The wife argued that the promise had created a legal obligation, while the husband contended that it lacked the necessary elements to be considered a binding contract. The evaluation of these arguments offered a comprehensive view of the legal reasoning and perspectives surrounding the case, contributing to the court’s decision.

Court Proceedings and Decision

The court proceedings in Combe v Combe encompassed a thorough analysis of evidence, legal arguments, and precedents. The court deliberated on whether the promise made by Mr. Combe to provide financial support to his ex-wife after divorce could be legally enforced. The final decision rested on the court’s interpretation of the promise and its consideration under contract law principles, leading to implications for similar cases involving familial assurances and contractual obligations.


In conclusion, Combe v Combe – 1951 represents a pivotal legal case that traversed the intricate interplay between familial assurances and contract law. The case highlighted the complexities inherent in enforcing promises made within family relationships as legally binding contracts. It underscored the challenges of applying traditional contract law doctrines, notably the doctrine of consideration, to promises made in the domestic sphere, shedding light on the limitations of contractual enforceability in such contexts.

Why Choose Us:

Our professional literature review writers craft personalized literature reviews tailored to your specific requirements. By conducting thorough research and employing expertise, we create custom literature reviews that align with your topic, ensuring in-depth analysis, proper citation, and adherence to academic standards for a comprehensive and unique review.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Combe v Combe – 1951' (, September 2012 ) <> accessed 25 April 2024
My, Law, Tutor. (September 2012 ). Combe v Combe – 1951. Retrieved from
"Combe v Combe – 1951." 9 2012. All Answers Ltd. 04 2024 <>.
"Combe v Combe – 1951." MyLawTutor., September 2012. Web. 25 April 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. September 2012. Combe v Combe – 1951. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 25 April 2024].
MyLawTutor. Combe v Combe – 1951 [Internet]. September 2012. [Accessed 25 April 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Combe v Combe – 1951 | |date=September 2012 |accessdate=25 April 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Dick Bentley v Harold Smith

. Last modified: April 24, 2024

Introduction to Dick Bentley v Harold Smith The world of contracts can be a complex one, especially when it comes to the interpretation of statements made during negotiations. Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] stands as a significant case in English contract law, offering valuable insights into the distinction between a […]

Performance Cars v Abraham

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to Performance Cars v Abraham Performance Cars Ltd v Abraham (1962) stands as a landmark case in English tort law, specifically regarding the concept of causation in negligence claims. This case study delves into the factual background, the legal issue at stake, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the lasting impact of the case […]

R v Hennessy – 1989

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to R v Hennessy – 1989 The criminal justice system grapples with complex issues when a defendant’s actions seem involuntary due to a medical condition. R v Hennessy (1989) stands as a significant case in English law, delving into the boundaries of the defense of automatism in the context of diabetic hypoglycemia. This case […]

go to top