Entores v Miles Far East Corporation

January 05, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s):

Introduction to Entores v Miles Far East Corporation

Entores v Miles Far East Corporation is a pivotal case in contract law, renowned for its exploration of contractual communications. The case originated from contractual disputes between Entores, acting as the plaintiffs, and Miles Far East Corporation, the defendants. The disagreement stemmed from issues concerning contractual obligations, acceptance, and the mode of communication, leading to a legal dispute requiring judicial resolution. This case’s significance lies in its exploration of communication modes and their implications in contract formation. It delves into the crucial aspect of contractual obligations concerning the acceptance of offers through different communication channels. The case serves as a guiding precedent in understanding the significance of communication methods in contract law, impacting legal interpretations and practices.

Parties Involved

Entores, the plaintiffs, initiated legal proceedings against Miles Far East Corporation, the defendants. Entores accused Miles Far East Corporation of breaching contractual obligations, leading to a legal dispute. Miles Far East Corporation defended against these claims during the proceedings. Entores, as the plaintiffs, alleged that Miles Far East Corporation breached contractual obligations. They argued that the method of communication used for acceptance had implications on contractual obligations. In contrast, Miles Far East Corporation defended their position, presenting counterarguments during the legal proceedings.

Legal Issues

The primary legal issue in Entores v Miles Far East Corporation revolves around contractual communications and their implications in contract formation. The case explores whether the mode of communication affects contractual acceptance and obligations. The case invokes legal principles surrounding contract formation, acceptance, and communication modes. It delves into legal precedents or doctrines related to communication methods and their effects on contractual obligations.

Court Proceedings and Arguments

The court proceedings involved extensive deliberations, evidence presentations, and legal arguments addressing the disputes raised by Entores against Miles Far East Corporation. These proceedings aimed to resolve the intricacies and determine contractual implications. Entores presented evidence and legal arguments, emphasizing the significance of communication methods in contractual acceptance. Conversely, Miles Far East Corporation countered these claims, defending their position regarding contractual obligations and communication methods.

Judgment and Ruling

The court delivered a final judgment considering the evidence, legal arguments, and applicable laws. The judgment outlined the factors contributing to the ruling, elucidating the implications of communication modes on contractual obligations. The judgment referred to legal precedents or statutes governing communication modes in contract law, establishing or reinforcing legal interpretations relevant to contract formation.

Impact and Significance

Entores v Miles Far East Corporation influences contractual practices by highlighting the significance of communication modes in contract formation. It emphasizes the need for clarity and understanding in contractual communications. The case holds significance in legal jurisprudence by shedding light on communication nuances, offering insights into their implications on contract formation and obligations, guiding future legal interpretations.

Academic and Professional Discourse

Legal scholars engage in extensive debates, analyses, or commentaries on the case’s implications, fostering academic discourse on contractual communication’s legal intricacies. Entores v Miles Far East Corporation remains relevant, sparking ongoing discussions within legal circles about communication nuances and their implications in contract law.


The case encapsulates the complexities of contractual communications, emphasizing their significance in contractual obligations and formation. Entores v Miles Far East Corporation signifies its legal significance in influencing contractual communications, obligations, and legal interpretations, leaving a lasting legacy in contract law.

Why Choose Us:

Our team comprises highly qualified law dissertation writers, possessing advanced degrees in law from esteemed institutions. These professionals demonstrate comprehensive knowledge across diverse legal domains, ensuring adeptness in handling multifaceted legal topics. Their qualifications encompass in-depth understanding of legal principles, statutes, and precedents, allowing for meticulous research and analysis within the legal framework. With years of experience, they possess exceptional writing skills, crafting coherent and well-structured dissertations aligned with academic standards. Their expertise enables them to provide insightful perspectives, nuanced arguments, and precise interpretations, ensuring the delivery of high-quality, tailored law dissertations that meet the exacting demands of academic rigor.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Entores v Miles Far East Corporation' (Mylawtutor.net, September 2012 ) <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/entores-v-miles-far-east-corporation> accessed 25 April 2024
My, Law, Tutor. (September 2012 ). Entores v Miles Far East Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/entores-v-miles-far-east-corporation
"Entores v Miles Far East Corporation." MyLawTutor.net. 9 2012. All Answers Ltd. 04 2024 <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/entores-v-miles-far-east-corporation>.
"Entores v Miles Far East Corporation." MyLawTutor. MyLawTutor.net, September 2012. Web. 25 April 2024. <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/entores-v-miles-far-east-corporation>.
MyLawTutor. September 2012. Entores v Miles Far East Corporation. [online]. Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/entores-v-miles-far-east-corporation [Accessed 25 April 2024].
MyLawTutor. Entores v Miles Far East Corporation [Internet]. September 2012. [Accessed 25 April 2024]; Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/entores-v-miles-far-east-corporation.
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url=https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/entores-v-miles-far-east-corporation |title=Entores v Miles Far East Corporation |publisher=MyLawTutor.net |date=September 2012 |accessdate=25 April 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Dick Bentley v Harold Smith

. Last modified: April 24, 2024

Introduction to Dick Bentley v Harold Smith The world of contracts can be a complex one, especially when it comes to the interpretation of statements made during negotiations. Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] stands as a significant case in English contract law, offering valuable insights into the distinction between a […]

Performance Cars v Abraham

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to Performance Cars v Abraham Performance Cars Ltd v Abraham (1962) stands as a landmark case in English tort law, specifically regarding the concept of causation in negligence claims. This case study delves into the factual background, the legal issue at stake, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the lasting impact of the case […]

R v Hennessy – 1989

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to R v Hennessy – 1989 The criminal justice system grapples with complex issues when a defendant’s actions seem involuntary due to a medical condition. R v Hennessy (1989) stands as a significant case in English law, delving into the boundaries of the defense of automatism in the context of diabetic hypoglycemia. This case […]

go to top