Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd

March 27, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s):

Introduction to Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd

The 1934 case of Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd stands as a pivotal decision in contract law, addressing the question of whether a missing term can render an entire agreement unenforceable. This case study delves into the facts, legal issues, arguments presented, and the court’s judgment, followed by a discussion of its lasting impact and the ongoing debate surrounding contractual certainty.

Facts of the Case:

The story unfolds with Mr. Foley, a businessman with both entrepreneurial spirit and a strategic location. He owned a piece of land that boasted a functioning petrol station, a valuable asset in the pre-war transportation landscape. Classique Coaches Ltd, a flourishing coach company, sought to expand their operations and expressed interest in acquiring part of Mr. Foley’s land. However, Mr. Foley envisioned a mutually beneficial arrangement. He agreed to sell the land but with a crucial condition: Classique Coaches would be obligated to purchase all their fuel exclusively from his petrol station, ensuring a steady stream of business for Mr. Foley. A formal agreement was drafted, outlining this exclusivity clause. However, a crucial detail was missing – the agreement failed to specify a price for the fuel. Despite this omission, Classique Coaches seemingly accepted the terms and proceeded to purchase fuel from Mr. Foley’s station for several years. This seemingly smooth partnership hit a roadblock when a lawyer representing Classique Coaches raised concerns about the agreement’s enforceability due to the missing price term. Classique Coaches subsequently stopped purchasing fuel from Mr. Foley, leaving him with a dilemma – an unfulfilled contract and a potentially declining fuel business. Undeterred, Mr. Foley took legal action, suing Classique Coaches for breach of contract.

Legal Issue:

The central legal issue revolved around the concept of contractual certainty. A fundamental principle of contract law dictates that agreements must be sufficiently clear and definite to be enforceable. The missing price term in the agreement between Mr. Foley and Classique Coaches cast doubt on its enforceability. The court had to decide whether this omission rendered the entire contract void.

Arguments Presented:

  • Plaintiff (Mr. Foley): Mr. Foley argued that the agreement, despite lacking a price term, clearly established an exclusivity clause. He emphasized that Classique Coaches had willingly complied with the terms for several years, demonstrating their acceptance of the agreement in its entirety. Furthermore, he contended that a fair market price could be determined at the time of each purchase, making the agreement clear enough to be enforced.
  • Defendant (Classique Coaches Ltd): Classique Coaches, on the other hand, argued that the absence of a price term created significant uncertainty. Without a clear price point, they claimed they could not be certain of their contractual obligations or how much they would be required to pay for fuel. This uncertainty, they argued, rendered the entire agreement unenforceable.


In a landmark decision, the court sided with Mr. Foley. The judge acknowledged the general principle of contractual certainty. However, the court found that the established practice of Classique Coaches purchasing fuel for several years, coupled with the clearly defined exclusivity clause, demonstrated a clear intention to form a binding agreement. The court reasoned that the missing price term did not negate the overall agreement. Instead, the court held that a reasonable price could be implied at the time of purchase, ensuring fairness for both parties.


The Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd case stands as a pivotal moment in contract law, offering a nuanced approach to the concept of contractual certainty. It demonstrates that missing terms don’t always render an agreement unenforceable. Courts can consider the parties’ conduct, established practices, and the overall intention behind the agreement when determining its enforceability.

Why Choose Us:

Sit back and relax while our skilled writers write an essay outline. We’ll take your instructions and preferences into account, ensuring that the outline aligns with your ideas and meets your academic objectives. Let us handle the outlining process while you focus on other tasks.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd' (, September 2012 ) <> accessed 25 April 2024
My, Law, Tutor. (September 2012 ). Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd. Retrieved from
"Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd." 9 2012. All Answers Ltd. 04 2024 <>.
"Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd." MyLawTutor., September 2012. Web. 25 April 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. September 2012. Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 25 April 2024].
MyLawTutor. Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd [Internet]. September 2012. [Accessed 25 April 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd | |date=September 2012 |accessdate=25 April 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Dick Bentley v Harold Smith

. Last modified: April 24, 2024

Introduction to Dick Bentley v Harold Smith The world of contracts can be a complex one, especially when it comes to the interpretation of statements made during negotiations. Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] stands as a significant case in English contract law, offering valuable insights into the distinction between a […]

Performance Cars v Abraham

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to Performance Cars v Abraham Performance Cars Ltd v Abraham (1962) stands as a landmark case in English tort law, specifically regarding the concept of causation in negligence claims. This case study delves into the factual background, the legal issue at stake, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the lasting impact of the case […]

R v Hennessy – 1989

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to R v Hennessy – 1989 The criminal justice system grapples with complex issues when a defendant’s actions seem involuntary due to a medical condition. R v Hennessy (1989) stands as a significant case in English law, delving into the boundaries of the defense of automatism in the context of diabetic hypoglycemia. This case […]

go to top