Grainger & Son v Gough 1896

April 15, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s):

Introduction to Grainger & Son v Gough 1896

Grainger & Son v Gough 1896 is a seminal case in the realm of contract law, illustrating the complexities surrounding contractual obligations and the sale of goods in the late 19th century. This case study aims to dissect its intricacies, providing insight into its background, legal issues, procedural history, and enduring impact on contract law jurisprudence.


The case revolves around a contractual dispute arising from the sale of goods, highlighting the application of legal principles governing contracts for the sale of goods in the 19th century. Against the backdrop of commercial transactions and contractual agreements, the case raises fundamental questions concerning contract formation, terms, and remedies for breach of contract.

Facts of the Case

Grainger & Son, the plaintiffs, entered into a contract with Gough, the defendant, for the sale of a horse. However, disputes arose regarding the quality and condition of the horse delivered by Gough, leading to allegations of breach of contract by Grainger & Son. The case thus centers on issues of contractual performance, warranties, and the assessment of damages for breach of contract.

Procedural History

The case underwent trial proceedings before a court of law, where the parties presented their respective arguments and evidence. Following the trial, the court rendered a decision, determining the liability of Gough for the alleged breach of contract. The case may have also involved appeals or subsequent legal actions, further shaping the legal resolution of the dispute.

Legal Analysis

Central to the legal analysis in Grainger & Son v Gough 1896 was the interpretation of contractual terms and the assessment of liability for breach of contract. The court grappled with questions surrounding the formation of the contract, the implied warranties of quality, and the fitness for purpose, and the remedies available to the aggrieved party for breach of contract. Moreover, the case raised issues concerning the application of legal principles governing contracts for the sale of goods, including the Sale of Goods Act 1893 and relevant common law principles.

Precedent and Legal Impact

The decision rendered in Grainger & Son v Gough 1896 had a significant impact on contract law jurisprudence, particularly in the context of sales of goods in the late 19th century. Its precedent influenced subsequent cases grappling with similar issues, providing guidance to courts and practitioners in interpreting and enforcing contracts for the sale of goods. Moreover, the case contributed to ongoing discussions surrounding the rights and obligations of parties in commercial transactions, shaping legal standards and practices in the sale of goods.

Critique and Controversies

As with any legal decision, Grainger & Son v Gough 1896 was subject to critique and controversy. Scholars and practitioners may debate the adequacy of the court’s reasoning, considering the complexities of contract law and the nuances of sales transactions in the 19th century. Moreover, the decision may have engendered broader debates surrounding the allocation of risk and liability between parties in commercial contracts, reflecting the tension between contractual freedom and consumer protection.


In conclusion, Grainger & Son v Gough 1896 represents a significant moment in the evolution of contract law, offering valuable insights into contractual obligations and remedies in sales transactions in the late 19th century. Its analysis sheds light on the complexities of commercial transactions and the challenges inherent in resolving disputes arising from contractual agreements.

Why Choose Us:

Our Literature Review Writing Help service offers expert assistance to students and researchers who require support in crafting comprehensive literature reviews for their academic projects. With a team of skilled writers, we ensure meticulous research, critical analysis, and coherent presentation, making us the preferred choice for literature review assistance.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Grainger & Son v Gough 1896' (, September 2012 ) <> accessed 26 May 2024
My, Law, Tutor. (September 2012 ). Grainger & Son v Gough 1896. Retrieved from
"Grainger & Son v Gough 1896." 9 2012. All Answers Ltd. 05 2024 <>.
"Grainger & Son v Gough 1896." MyLawTutor., September 2012. Web. 26 May 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. September 2012. Grainger & Son v Gough 1896. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 26 May 2024].
MyLawTutor. Grainger & Son v Gough 1896 [Internet]. September 2012. [Accessed 26 May 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Grainger & Son v Gough 1896 | |date=September 2012 |accessdate=26 May 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Dick Bentley v Harold Smith

. Last modified: May 20, 2024

 Introduction to Dick Bentley v Harold Smith The world of contracts can be a complex one, especially when it comes to the interpretation of statements made during negotiations. Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] stands as a significant case in English contract law, offering valuable insights into the distinction between […]

Performance Cars v Abraham

. Last modified: April 26, 2024

Introduction to Performance Cars v Abraham Performance Cars Ltd v Abraham (1962) stands as a landmark case in English tort law, specifically regarding the concept of causation in negligence claims. This case study delves into the factual background, the legal issue at stake, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the lasting impact of the case […]

R v Hennessy – 1989

. Last modified: April 26, 2024

Introduction to R v Hennessy – 1989 The criminal justice system grapples with complex issues when a defendant’s actions seem involuntary due to a medical condition. R v Hennessy (1989) stands as a significant case in English law, delving into the boundaries of the defense of automatism in the context of diabetic hypoglycemia. This case […]

go to top