My Law Tutor

Ingram v Little – 1961

January 15, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Introduction Ingram v Little – 1961:

The case of Ingram v Little, decided in the House of Lords in 1961, stands as a significant legal milestone within property law. This landmark case drew attention due to its pivotal role in shaping interpretations of property rights. Ingram v Little’s impact reverberated beyond its immediate circumstances, influencing subsequent legal doctrines and approaches to resolving property disputes.

Ingram v Little centered on conflicting claims regarding property rights, presenting a compelling legal puzzle for the House of Lords to unravel. The case’s enduring relevance arises from its contribution to property law principles and its implications for guiding future property-related litigations. Through its nuanced exploration of property ownership intricacies, this case established a foundation for clarifying legal entitlements concerning real estate and property holdings.

Parties Involved:

The case featured two primary parties with contrasting claims: Ingram, the plaintiff, and Little, the defendant. Ingram asserted rights to a specific property, contending their rightful ownership. Little, on the other hand, challenged Ingram’s claims, contesting the asserted ownership or entitlements.

Ingram’s position in the case revolved around substantiating their legitimate ownership or usage rights over the property in question. In contrast, Little sought to dispute or counter Ingram’s assertions by presenting their opposing legal arguments and evidence. The divergence in their claims formed the crux of the legal dispute that demanded resolution before the House of Lords.

Case Background:

The underlying disagreement leading to Ingram v Little centered on conflicting assertions regarding property rights. The case stemmed from a contentious scenario where Ingram and Little found themselves at odds over the legal entitlements associated with a particular property.

The dispute’s genesis lay in differing interpretations and claims regarding ownership, usage, or entitlements concerning the property. The conflicting perspectives of Ingram and Little prompted legal recourse, necessitating intervention by the House of Lords to adjudicate the intricate web of property rights contentions.

Legal Proceedings:

The legal process involved Ingram and Little presenting their respective arguments before the House of Lords. Ingram advocated for the legitimacy of their property claims, backed by evidence and legal precedents. Little countered these claims with their arguments and evidence supporting their opposing stance.

The House of Lords meticulously analyzed the arguments, evidence, and applicable legal principles before reaching a decision. The judgment rendered clarified the legal basis for property rights, resolving the dispute between Ingram and Little.

Impact and Precedent:

Ingram v Little set a significant precedent in property law. The decision established a clear framework for adjudicating property disputes, providing guidance for similar cases. The ruling’s implications extended beyond the immediate dispute, serving as a reference for future property ownership controversies.

The judgment’s enduring impact influenced subsequent interpretations of property law, ensuring clarity and consistency in resolving property rights disputes. Its precedent provided a basis for legal professionals and courts in navigating similar cases and contributed to the development of property law principles.


Ingram v Little’s legacy lies in its contribution to property law, providing a benchmark for determining property rights. The case exemplified the importance of evidence, legal arguments, and precedent in resolving disputes, ensuring fairness and clarity in property ownership matters.

Ingram v Little, with its lasting impact and influence on property law, remains a notable legal reference, emphasizing the significance of meticulous legal analysis in adjudicating complex property disputes within the legal framework.

Why Choose Us:

When assignments are assigned to our Law Assignment Writers, a comprehensive process begins. Firstly, we assess the assignment’s requirements, ensuring a clear understanding of the topic, guidelines, and any specific instructions. Our team then matches the task with a writer possessing expertise in the relevant legal field. The assigned writer conducts thorough research, gathering credible sources and legal references. They meticulously structure the assignment, crafting a coherent and well-argued document. Throughout this process, we maintain open communication, allowing for client feedback and writer-client interaction, ensuring alignment with the client’s expectations. Finally, each assignment undergoes a quality check to guarantee accuracy, originality, and adherence to academic standards before delivery.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Ingram v Little – 1961' (, ) <> accessed 24 July 2024
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). Ingram v Little – 1961. Retrieved from
"Ingram v Little – 1961." . All Answers Ltd. 07 2024 <>.
"Ingram v Little – 1961." MyLawTutor., . Web. 24 July 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. . Ingram v Little – 1961. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 24 July 2024].
MyLawTutor. Ingram v Little – 1961 [Internet]. . [Accessed 24 July 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Ingram v Little – 1961 | |date= |accessdate=24 July 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Imperial Chemical Industries v Shatwell

UK Law . Last modified: March 26, 2024

Introduction to Imperial Chemical Industries v Shatwell: The quest for a safe work environment is a constant tension between employer responsibility and employee conduct. The landmark case of Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 exemplifies this tension, shaping the legal landscape of employer liability for employee injuries arising from disregarding safety protocols. […]

Cole v Turner

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Cole v Turner: Cole v Turner is a pivotal case in contract law, addressing issues of offer, acceptance, and consideration. This case study offers a detailed examination of Cole v Turner, exploring its background, legal issues, court proceedings, judgment, impact, controversies, and significance within contract law jurisprudence. Background: Cole v Turner originated from […]

General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1954] AC 180

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

 Introduction to General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1954] AC 180 General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1954] AC 180 is a seminal case that explores the complexities of contract law, specifically the doctrine of frustration. The case involves a dispute between General Cleaning Contractors (the plaintiff) and Christmas (the defendant) regarding the frustration of a […]

Stansbie v Troman – 1948

UK Law . Last modified: March 7, 2024

Introduction to Stansbie v Troman: Stansbie v Troman (1948) stands as a seminal case in contract law, addressing issues of contractual duty and breach of duty. This case, heard in the English courts, sheds light on the legal principles surrounding the duty of care owed by contractors to their clients. Background: In 1948, Mrs. Stansbie […]

Mansfield v Weetabix – 1998

UK Law . Last modified: March 5, 2024

Introduction to Mansfield v Weetabix: Mansfield v Weetabix – 1998 stands as a seminal case in legal jurisprudence, highlighting the intersection of contract law and product liability. In this case study, we delve into the background, legal issues, arguments presented, procedural history, analysis, decision, and implications of this landmark litigation. This examination sheds light on […]

Merritt v Merritt – 1970

UK Law . Last modified: January 11, 2024

Introduction to Merritt v Merritt – 1970 “Merritt v Merritt” stands as a significant case in contract law due to its involvement with a dispute between spouses, Mr. and Mrs. Merritt. This case serves as an exemplar in the legal sphere, focusing on the validity and enforceability of agreements made within marital relationships. The case’s […]

go to top