My Law Tutor

Mortgage Corporation v Shaire

March 27, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Introduction to Mortgage Corporation v Shaire:

The 2001 case of Mortgage Corporation v Shaire stands as a landmark decision in English land law, impacting both mortgage law and the legal intricacies of co-ownership. This case study delves into the facts, legal issues, arguments presented, and the court’s judgment, followed by a discussion of its lasting impact and the various legal principles it addresses.

Facts of the Case:

The story unfolds with a couple, Mr. Fox and Mrs. Shaire, who co-owned a house. The ownership details weren’t explicitly defined, but it was accepted that Mrs. Shaire had a larger share (around 75%) based on her greater contribution to the purchase price. Mr. Fox, unbeknownst to Mrs. Shaire, decided to secure a mortgage on the property. However, he committed a fraudulent act by forging Mrs. Shaire’s signature on the mortgage documents. Unfortunately, Mr. Fox defaulted on the mortgage repayments, leaving the Mortgage Corporation, the lender, in a precarious situation.

Legal Issues:

The case presented two central legal issues:

  1. Mortgage Validity: Could the mortgage be considered valid for Mrs. Shaire’s share of the property, even though her signature was forged?
  2. Discretion in Property Law: Did the court have the authority to order a sale of the property to satisfy the mortgage debt, considering the emotional attachment of Mrs. Shaire, the innocent co-owner?

Arguments Presented:

  • Plaintiff (Mortgage Corporation):
    • Despite the forgery, the Mortgage Corporation argued that the mortgage was a valid charge on the entire property. They sought an order for sale to recover the outstanding debt.
  • Defendant (Mrs. Shaire):
    • Mrs. Shaire countered that the forged signature rendered the entire mortgage void. She argued that she should not be held liable for Mr. Fox’s actions.


The court delivered a groundbreaking judgment.

  • Mortgage Validity: The court acknowledged the general principle that a forged signature renders a contract void. However, in this case, the court applied the concept of “non est factum” – a legal doctrine stating that a document is not considered a deed if the party signing it did not understand its nature or effect due to a fundamental mistake. In this instance, Mrs. Shaire was completely unaware of the mortgage and did not consent to it. Therefore, the court found the mortgage to be valid only for Mr. Fox’s 25% share of the property.
  • Discretion in Property Law: The case also addressed the court’s authority in property law matters. Prior to the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA), the emphasis was on enforcing pre-existing interests (like mortgages) through a “sale” order. However, TOLATA introduced a more flexible approach. The court, in this case, acknowledged Mrs. Shaire’s emotional attachment to the property and the potential hardship of a forced sale. Therefore, instead of an immediate sale, the court ordered Mr. Fox’s 25% share to be treated as a loan owed to the Mortgage Corporation, with Mrs. Shaire having the option to repay it at a reasonable interest rate. Failure to repay would then lead to repossession of Mr. Fox’s share only.

Conclusion: The Mortgage Corporation v Shaire case stands as a pivotal decision with a multifaceted legacy. It offers crucial protection for innocent co-owners from the consequences of fraudulent actions by their partners. Furthermore, it underscores the court’s growing discretion in property law matters, allowing for solutions that balance legal obligations with the human element of ownership and emotional attachment to property. While the case raises questions about the potential implications for lenders, it ultimately represents a significant step towards a more nuanced and equitable approach to resolving co-ownership disputes and safeguarding the rights of innocent parties in mortgage transactions.

Why Choose Us: Struggling to outline your essay? Let us take care of it for you! Our professional writers will craft a clear and logical outline tailored to your topic and requirements. With our expert essay outline services, you can rest assured that your essay will be well-organized and ready for writing.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Mortgage Corporation v Shaire' (, ) <> accessed 24 July 2024
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). Mortgage Corporation v Shaire. Retrieved from
"Mortgage Corporation v Shaire." . All Answers Ltd. 07 2024 <>.
"Mortgage Corporation v Shaire." MyLawTutor., . Web. 24 July 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. . Mortgage Corporation v Shaire. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 24 July 2024].
MyLawTutor. Mortgage Corporation v Shaire [Internet]. . [Accessed 24 July 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Mortgage Corporation v Shaire | |date= |accessdate=24 July 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

R v Caldwell

UK Law . Last modified: April 3, 2024

Introduction to R v Caldwell The case of R v Caldwell stands as a pivotal moment in legal history, significantly impacting the understanding of criminal liability in cases involving reckless behavior. This case study aims to delve into the intricacies of the case, exploring its implications on legal precedent and the broader legal landscape. Parties […]

Tinn v Hoffman and Co 1873

UK Law . Last modified: January 24, 2024

Introduction to Tinn v Hoffman and Co 1873: Imagine a handshake deal gone wrong, a misunderstanding over a hefty iron order, and a subsequent legal battle that reshaped the very fabric of contract formation. This is the story of Tinn v Hoffman and Co (1873), a pivotal case that shed light on the intricate interplay […]

R v Ghosh – 1982

UK Law . Last modified: July 10, 2024

 Introduction to R v Ghosh: R v Ghosh (1982) stands as a seminal case within the annals of criminal law, its significance reverberating through legal precedents and judicial interpretation. This case study aims to dissect its intricacies, delving into its background, procedural history, legal analysis, and lasting impact. Background At its core, R v […]

Copeland v Greenhalf [1952]

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Copeland v Greenhalf: Copeland v Greenhalf [1952] stands as a seminal case in contract and tort law, shedding light on the intricate dynamics of legal disputes and the principles governing contractual relationships. This case delves into the clash between contractual obligations and tortious conduct, shaping the trajectory of legal principles in the United […]

Woodward v Mayor of Hastings

UK Law . Last modified: March 7, 2024

Introduction to Woodward v Mayor of Hastings: Woodward v Mayor of Hastings is a notable case in local government law, which sheds light on the scope of municipal liability and the duty of care owed by local authorities to citizens. This case study delves into the intricacies of the dispute between Woodward and the Mayor […]

Ogwo v Taylor – Case Brief

UK Law . Last modified: March 8, 2024

Introduction to Ogwo v Taylor: Ogwo v Taylor is a landmark case that delves into property rights and trespass issues. The case was heard in the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, in 1987. The judgment was delivered on [date], with Mr. Justice Fox presiding over the proceedings. Facts of the Case: The case […]

go to top