My Law Tutor

Osman v Ferguson – 1993

March 05, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s):

Introduction to Osman v Ferguson – 1993:

The case of Osman v Ferguson, a pivotal legal dispute that transpired in 1993, delves into the intricacies of the duty of care owed by public authorities concerning the safeguarding of individuals’ human rights, particularly their right to life.

Background Information: At the crux of the case lies the tragic demise of Ahmet Osman, a Turkish-Cypriot teenager, who met his untimely death at the hands of a police officer, Inspector Esmail Ali, during an altercation in London in 1988. This incident unfolded amidst reports of a disturbance involving Osman and his companions, prompting police intervention.

Facts of the Case: During the encounter, Inspector Ali discharged his firearm, resulting in the fatal shooting of Osman. Subsequent investigations revealed that Osman was unarmed at the time of the incident, raising profound concerns regarding the actions of the police officer and the perceived use of excessive force.

Legal Issues Presented: A central legal issue in Osman v Ferguson pertains to the liability of the police officer, Inspector Ali, and the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Paul Condon, under the purview of the Human Rights Act 1998. Specifically, the case interrogates whether they could be held accountable for infringing upon Osman’s right to life, as enshrined in Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Court Proceedings: The case underwent adjudication in the UK courts, with the Osman family seeking redress for Ahmet Osman’s demise. Ultimately, the matter ascended to the House of Lords, the apex court in the UK at the time, for deliberation.

Arguments of the Parties: The Osman family contended that the police had failed in their duty to uphold Osman’s right to life and asserted that Inspector Ali’s use of lethal force was unwarranted and disproportionate. Conversely, the defendants, represented by the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, argued that Inspector Ali acted in self-defense and within the ambit of his official duties.

Judicial Analysis: Upon meticulous examination of the case, the House of Lords scrutinized the factual matrix and elucidated the pertinent legal tenets, including the duty of care incumbent upon public authorities pursuant to the Human Rights Act 1998. The court deliberated on whether the police had taken reasonable measures to safeguard Osman’s life and assessed the reasonableness of Inspector Ali’s use of force.

Legal Precedents and Principles Established: In its adjudication, the House of Lords delineated that public authorities, including law enforcement agencies, bear a duty of care towards individuals under the Human Rights Act 1998. Furthermore, the court underscored the imperative of exercising discretion in the use of force, emphasizing the principle of proportionality.

Outcome and Implications: As a consequence of the verdict, the Osman family received compensation for the loss of Ahmet Osman. The case engendered significant ramifications concerning the accountability of public authorities vis-à-vis the protection of individuals’ human rights, particularly in instances involving the application of force by law enforcement officers.

Conclusion: In summation, Osman v Ferguson – 1993 epitomizes the nexus between law, ethics, and societal norms, spotlighting the imperative of upholding individuals’ inviolable right to life. The case not only cemented crucial legal precedents regarding the duty of care owed by public authorities but also served as a clarion call for the judicious exercise of discretion in matters concerning the use of force. Through its adjudication, the House of Lords reaffirmed the paramountcy of safeguarding human rights and underscored the indispensable role of the judiciary in upholding justice and accountability.

Why Choose Us: Law PowerPoint Presentation Services offer tailored solutions for legal professionals, educators, and students seeking to convey complex legal concepts effectively. Through visually engaging slides and concise content, these services facilitate clearer understanding and retention of information. Whether used in legal seminars, classroom lectures, or courtroom presentations, Law PowerPoint Presentation Services provide a dynamic platform to elucidate intricate legal principles with clarity and impact. By leveraging creative design and strategic storytelling, these services empower presenters to deliver compelling arguments, educate audiences, and navigate legal complexities with confidence.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Osman v Ferguson – 1993' (, ) <> accessed 24 July 2024
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). Osman v Ferguson – 1993. Retrieved from
"Osman v Ferguson – 1993." . All Answers Ltd. 07 2024 <>.
"Osman v Ferguson – 1993." MyLawTutor., . Web. 24 July 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. . Osman v Ferguson – 1993. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 24 July 2024].
MyLawTutor. Osman v Ferguson – 1993 [Internet]. . [Accessed 24 July 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Osman v Ferguson – 1993 | |date= |accessdate=24 July 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>
go to top