R v Adomako – 1995

March 13, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s):


R v Adomako – 1995 is a landmark case that profoundly influenced the legal landscape regarding medical negligence and criminal liability. This case delves into the tragic events leading to the death of a patient and the subsequent criminal prosecution of Dr. Adomako, setting a precedent for accountability in medical practice.


The case emerged from an incident during a routine medical procedure where the patient suffered a fatal anesthetic mishap. Dr. Adomako, the anesthesiologist, faced criminal charges for gross negligence manslaughter due to his alleged failure to meet the standard of care expected of a medical professional. The case raised significant questions about the boundaries of medical responsibility and legal accountability.

Facts of the Case:

During the medical procedure, Dr. Adomako failed to notice and rectify a critical issue with the patient’s breathing apparatus, leading to irreversible harm and eventual death. The facts of the case highlighted Dr. Adomako’s alleged negligence in monitoring the patient’s condition and responding promptly to signs of distress. These factual circumstances formed the basis of the criminal charges brought against him.

Legal Issues:

The case brought to the forefront complex legal issues surrounding medical negligence and criminal liability. It required a careful examination of the legal principles governing the duty of care owed by medical professionals, the standard of care expected in medical practice, and the threshold for establishing criminal negligence in medical settings.

Court Proceedings:

The case proceeded to trial, with both the prosecution and the defense presenting compelling legal arguments before the court. The prosecution sought to establish Dr. Adomako’s culpability for the patient’s death, emphasizing his alleged disregard for basic safety protocols. In contrast, the defense argued for a more nuanced understanding of the circumstances, contending that Dr. Adomako’s actions did not meet the threshold for criminal negligence.


After careful deliberation, the court rendered its judgment, finding Dr. Adomako guilty of gross negligence manslaughter. The judgment emphasized Dr. Adomako’s duty of care towards the patient and his failure to meet the requisite standard of care expected of a competent medical professional. The ruling set a precedent for holding medical practitioners accountable for gross negligence leading to patient harm or death.

Impact and Significance:

The judgment in R v Adomako – 1995 had profound implications for medical practice and legal accountability. It underscored the paramount importance of upholding the duty of care owed by medical professionals to their patients and ensuring accountability for lapses in patient safety. The case prompted healthcare institutions to reassess their safety protocols and prioritize patient welfare.

Moreover, the ruling served as a wake-up call for medical practitioners, highlighting the potential legal consequences of negligence in patient care. It fostered a culture of vigilance and accountability within the medical profession, emphasizing the imperative of continuous improvement in patient safety standards.


R v Adomako – 1995 stands as a watershed moment in medical negligence law, reshaping the legal landscape and emphasizing the centrality of patient safety in medical practice. Through meticulous legal analysis and deliberation, the court reaffirmed the duty of care owed by medical professionals and underscored the need for accountability in cases of gross negligence. The case serves as a poignant reminder of the profound impact of medical negligence on patient welfare and the imperative of upholding the highest standards of care in healthcare settings.

Why Choose Us:

For meticulous law paper revision, trust our expert team to refine your content. With keen attention to detail and thorough analysis, we enhance clarity, coherence, and adherence to legal principles. Let us elevate your law paper to meet the highest academic standards.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'R v Adomako – 1995' (Mylawtutor.net, September 2012 ) <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/r-v-adomako-1995> accessed 23 April 2024
My, Law, Tutor. (September 2012 ). R v Adomako – 1995. Retrieved from https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/r-v-adomako-1995
"R v Adomako – 1995." MyLawTutor.net. 9 2012. All Answers Ltd. 04 2024 <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/r-v-adomako-1995>.
"R v Adomako – 1995." MyLawTutor. MyLawTutor.net, September 2012. Web. 23 April 2024. <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/r-v-adomako-1995>.
MyLawTutor. September 2012. R v Adomako – 1995. [online]. Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/r-v-adomako-1995 [Accessed 23 April 2024].
MyLawTutor. R v Adomako – 1995 [Internet]. September 2012. [Accessed 23 April 2024]; Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/r-v-adomako-1995.
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url=https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/r-v-adomako-1995 |title=R v Adomako – 1995 |publisher=MyLawTutor.net |date=September 2012 |accessdate=23 April 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Dick Bentley v Harold Smith

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to Dick Bentley v Harold Smith The world of contracts can be a complex one, especially when it comes to the interpretation of statements made during negotiations. Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] stands as a significant case in English contract law, offering valuable insights into the distinction between a […]

Performance Cars v Abraham

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to Performance Cars v Abraham Performance Cars Ltd v Abraham (1962) stands as a landmark case in English tort law, specifically regarding the concept of causation in negligence claims. This case study delves into the factual background, the legal issue at stake, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the lasting impact of the case […]

R v Hennessy – 1989

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to R v Hennessy – 1989 The criminal justice system grapples with complex issues when a defendant’s actions seem involuntary due to a medical condition. R v Hennessy (1989) stands as a significant case in English law, delving into the boundaries of the defense of automatism in the context of diabetic hypoglycemia. This case […]

go to top