My Law Tutor

Revill v Newbery – 1996

January 11, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Introduction to Revill v Newbery – 1996

Revill v Newbery is a crucial legal case concerning negligence in tort law. This case revolves around an incident involving Mr. Revill and Mr. Newbery, which led to a legal dispute over negligence. It’s a significant case because it helps to understand how the law addresses situations where one person might be responsible for causing harm or damage to another unintentionally.


The case emerged from an event where Mr. Revill suffered an injury due to the negligence of Mr. Newbery. The incident occurred in circumstances that led to Mr. Revill’s injury, prompting him to take legal action. It involves the detailed narrative of what happened, where it happened, and the events leading up to the disagreement that ended up in court.

Legal Issue

The central question the court needed to resolve in Revill v Newbery was whether Mr. Newbery’s actions amounted to negligence as per the law. Both parties presented their arguments about whether Mr. Newbery failed in his duty of care towards Mr. Revill. This case scrutinized the duty of care owed by one person to another in a situation where harm resulted from alleged negligence.

Chronology of Events

This section outlines a chronological sequence of incidents that transpired before the legal dispute. It meticulously details the series of events leading up to the situation where Mr. Revill sustained harm due to the actions or negligence of Mr. Newbery. It paints a comprehensive picture of the events, providing context and background leading to the legal conflict.

Court Proceedings

The court proceedings of Revill v Newbery encapsulated a comprehensive legal examination of the evidence and arguments presented by both sides. Witnesses might have testified, evidence would have been presented, and legal arguments made to establish whether negligence occurred and if Mr. Newbery was liable for the harm suffered by Mr. Revill.

Judgment and Ruling

Following a thorough examination of evidence and arguments, the court arrived at a decision. The judge or jury pronounced their judgment, determining whether Mr. Newbery’s actions constituted negligence, and if so, the legal consequences that followed. The court provided a detailed explanation justifying their decision based on the law and evidence presented during the trial.

Impact and Precedent

The case of Revill v Newbery has a lasting impact on how negligence cases are approached in tort law. The court’s decision set a precedent, influencing similar cases and guiding future legal interpretations. This precedent served as a reference point for subsequent cases involving similar circumstances of alleged negligence.

Significance and Lessons

Revill v Newbery holds significance in highlighting the application of duty of care in negligence cases. It emphasizes the importance of understanding legal responsibilities towards others and the implications of breaching such responsibilities. The case serves as a lesson in recognizing and fulfilling duties owed to prevent harm to others.


In conclusion, Revill v Newbery elucidates the intricacies of negligence in tort law. It emphasizes the duty of care and its role in legal disputes involving harm caused by alleged negligence. This case stands as a significant reference point in understanding legal obligations and liability concerning negligence, shaping future legal interpretations and applications in similar cases.

Why Choose Us:

Our process of hiring Law Writing Experts involves rigorous evaluation and selection criteria. We seek professionals with specialized legal knowledge, academic expertise, and a proven track record in legal writing. Applicants undergo thorough assessments, including subject-specific tests, writing samples, and verification of credentials. We prioritize candidates with advanced degrees in law, ensuring their competence and understanding of legal principles. Moreover, we assess their ability to research, analyze complex legal issues, and articulate coherent arguments. Our recruitment process emphasizes expertise, experience, and a commitment to delivering high-quality, accurate, and well-researched legal content for our clients.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Revill v Newbery – 1996' (, ) <> accessed 24 July 2024
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). Revill v Newbery – 1996. Retrieved from
"Revill v Newbery – 1996." . All Answers Ltd. 07 2024 <>.
"Revill v Newbery – 1996." MyLawTutor., . Web. 24 July 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. . Revill v Newbery – 1996. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 24 July 2024].
MyLawTutor. Revill v Newbery – 1996 [Internet]. . [Accessed 24 July 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Revill v Newbery – 1996 | |date= |accessdate=24 July 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Shaw v DPP – 1962

UK Law . Last modified: March 4, 2024

Introduction to Shaw v DPP: In 1962, the House of Lords, the highest court in the United Kingdom, grappled with a contentious issue in the case of Shaw v DPP. The defendant, Charles Shaw, faced charges for publishing advertisements for prostitutes in his magazines, raising questions about morality, expression, and the very scope of the […]

Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire The case of Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire is pivotal in legal circles due to its profound impact on negligence law. It emerged from tragic events during the Hillsborough Stadium disaster in 1989, where multiple football fans lost their lives or suffered severe injuries. […]

Aslan v Murphy (No 1)

UK Law . Last modified: June 10, 2024

Introduction to Aslan v Murphy (No 1) In the heart of English land law lies the landmark case of Aslan v Murphy (No 1). Decided in 1989 by the Court of Appeal, this case grappled with a fundamental question: does Mr. Aslan’s occupation of a cramped basement room amount to a protected tenancy under the […]

Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw – 1956

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw: The case of Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw (1956) serves as a significant precedent in the realm of tort law, particularly regarding the legal principles surrounding causation and liability for industrial diseases. This case, heard in the House of Lords, delved into the complexities of negligence and established important legal […]

Adams v Cape Industries

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Adams v Cape Industries Adams v Cape Industries is a landmark case in corporate law that delves into the relationship between parent companies and their subsidiaries regarding legal liability. The case involves an employee, Mr. Adams, who suffered harm due to asbestos exposure while working for a subsidiary of Cape Industries PLC. This […]

St Helen’s Smelting Co v Tipping – 1865

UK Law . Last modified: March 13, 2024

Introduction to St Helen’s Smelting Co v Tipping: St Helen’s Smelting Co v Tipping, a landmark case in English law, illuminated the evolving concept of nuisance and its implications for property rights. This case delved into the clash between industrial progress and individual rights, shaping the trajectory of nuisance law in the United Kingdom. Background: […]

go to top