My Law Tutor

Shaw v DPP – 1962

March 04, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Introduction to Shaw v DPP:

In 1962, the House of Lords, the highest court in the United Kingdom, grappled with a contentious issue in the case of Shaw v DPP. The defendant, Charles Shaw, faced charges for publishing advertisements for prostitutes in his magazines, raising questions about morality, expression, and the very scope of the English common law. This case stands as a landmark decision, reshaping the boundaries of acceptable conduct and judicial authority.

Facts of the Case

Shaw published magazines containing numerous “ladies’ advertisements,” essentially personal ads for prostitutes seeking clients. These ads included names, addresses, and descriptions of services offered. Shaw was charged with two key offenses:

  • Conspiracy to corrupt public morals: This charge, unprecedented in codified law, rested on the argument that Shaw’s publications aimed to promote prostitution and undermine public morality.
  • Living on immoral earnings: This charge stemmed from Shaw’s income generated from the advertisements.

The existing legislation, like the Street Offences Act 1959, proved insufficient to address the specific nature of Shaw’s activities.

Issues of the Case

The central legal question revolved around the validity of the “conspiracy to corrupt public morals” charge. This hinged on two crucial issues:

  • Recognition of a Common Law Offense: Does the common law, traditionally evolving without codified statutes, hold the power to recognize entirely new offenses, like corrupting public morals?
  • Balancing Rights and Morality: How can individual freedoms, particularly freedom of expression, be protected while ensuring societal well-being and upholding public morality?

Arguments Presented

The Prosecution:

  • Shaw’s publications explicitly and directly aimed to promote prostitution, a demonstrably harmful and immoral activity.
  • The common law has always adapted to societal needs, and this new offense is necessary to address emerging threats to public morality.
  • Shaw’s commercial motivations in profiting from prostitution cannot be shielded under the guise of free speech.

Shaw’s Defense:

  • No established statute defines or prohibits “corrupting public morals,” making the charge arbitrary and exceeding judicial authority.
  • The common law should not create such vaguely defined offenses, granting judges excessive power and posing threats to individual freedoms.
  • Shaw’s activities fall under the purview of legitimate commercial speech and should be protected by freedom of expression principles.

Court’s Decision and Reasoning

The House of Lords, in a controversial decision, upheld Shaw’s conviction. Their reasoning centered on:

  • The perceived necessity to protect public morals from tangible harms beyond existing offenses.
  • The common law’s inherent power to evolve and adapt to address changing societal concerns, as with evolving public expectations surrounding morality.
  • The specific nature of Shaw’s publications, demonstrably aimed at facilitating and profiting from prostitution, deemed a direct threat to public morality.

Impact and Analysis

Shaw v DPP had a profound impact on a range of legal and societal issues:

  • Established the offense of “conspiracy to corrupt public morals” in English common law, setting a precedent for judicial lawmaking in response to emerging concerns.
  • Sparked ongoing debates about the balance between individual rights, particularly free speech, and societal protection of public morality.
  • Raised concerns about the potential for abuse of vague legal principles and the expansion of judicial power.

The decision’s strengths include addressing evolving societal needs and protecting public morality from identifiable harms. However, criticisms focus on the vagueness of the offense, potential for abuse by authorities, and potential chill on legitimate forms of expression.

Conclusion: Shaw v DPP remains a landmark case, influencing interpretations of common law, freedom of expression, and the scope of judicial power. The decision exemplifies the complex interplay between individual rights, societal protection, and the challenges of adapting legal frameworks to evolving social landscapes. By analyzing its impact and ongoing debates, we gain valuable insights into the ongoing struggles to balance competing values in a diverse and changing society.

Why Choose Us: Law Assignment Services offers invaluable support to law students, providing expert assistance for complex assignments. We make it accessible by combining expertise with affordability, ensuring students can access high-quality guidance tailored to their needs. Our goal is to empower every law student on their academic journey.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Shaw v DPP – 1962' (, ) <> accessed 24 July 2024
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). Shaw v DPP – 1962. Retrieved from
"Shaw v DPP – 1962." . All Answers Ltd. 07 2024 <>.
"Shaw v DPP – 1962." MyLawTutor., . Web. 24 July 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. . Shaw v DPP – 1962. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 24 July 2024].
MyLawTutor. Shaw v DPP – 1962 [Internet]. . [Accessed 24 July 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Shaw v DPP – 1962 | |date= |accessdate=24 July 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

North Ocean Shipping v Hyundai

UK Law . Last modified: April 1, 2024

Introduction to North Ocean Shipping v Hyundai North Ocean Shipping v Hyundai [1979] is a landmark case in English contract law concerning contractual interpretation, frustration of contract, and the allocation of risk in international transactions. This case study delves into the details of the dispute, the legal questions it raised, and its lasting impact on […]

Bannister v Bannister [1948]

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Bannister v Bannister: Bannister v Bannister [1948] is a seminal case in legal history, delving into intricate issues in both contract and tort law. This case study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the background, legal issues, arguments, procedural history, analysis, decision, and implications of this significant litigation. By exploring the complexities […]

Dick Bentley v Harold Smith

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

 Introduction to Dick Bentley v Harold Smith The world of contracts can be a complex one, especially when it comes to the interpretation of statements made during negotiations. Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] stands as a significant case in English contract law, offering valuable insights into the distinction between […]

Wilkinson v Downton – 1897

UK Law . Last modified: December 21, 2023

Introduction of the case: Wilkinson v Downton, a notable legal case from 1897, involved a significant dispute between Mr. Wilkinson and Mrs. Downton, which led to a groundbreaking legal decision. The case centered on an incident where Mrs. Downton intentionally misled Mr. Wilkinson by falsely informing him that his wife had been in a serious […]

Southwark LBC v Mills

UK Law . Last modified: March 26, 2024

Introduction to Southwark LBC v Mills: Southwark LBC v Mills is a notable case in landlord-tenant law that delves into the intricate dynamics of the relationship between landlords and tenants. This case study provides a comprehensive analysis of the legal complexities involved, shedding light on its background, legal issues, court proceedings, judgment, and its significance […]

Pilcher v Rawlins

UK Law . Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to Pilcher v Rawlins In the annals of legal history, Pilcher v Rawlins holds a significant place, representing a pivotal moment in the evolution of legal principles. This case study endeavors to dissect its intricacies, shedding light on its contextual background, the legal issues it entailed, and its enduring impact on legal jurisprudence. Background […]

go to top