Wilsons and Clyde Co v English

April 03, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s):

Introduction to Wilsons and Clyde Co v English

Wilsons and Clyde Coal Co v English (1937) is a landmark case decided by the House of Lords, the highest court in the United Kingdom at the time. This case centered on an employer’s duty to provide a safe workplace and the concept of delegating that responsibility.

Facts of the Case

  • Mr. English, an employee of Wilsons and Clyde Coal Co., was working in an underground mine when he was crushed by haulage machinery.
  • The accident occurred because a safety measure, stopping haulage during shift changes, was not followed.
  • Mr. English sued his employer for negligence, claiming they failed to provide a safe system of work.
  • The employer argued they had delegated the responsibility of maintaining a safe system of work to a competent employee.

 Legal Issue

The central legal question revolved around an employer’s duty of care.

  • Could an employer absolve themselves of responsibility for workplace safety by delegating that duty to another employee?
  • Does the employer retain ultimate responsibility for ensuring a safe working environment?

Holding

The House of Lords unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. English. They established a crucial principle in employer liability:

  • Non-Delegable Duty: An employer has a non-delegable duty to provide a safe system of work for their employees.
  • This duty cannot be entirely discharged by simply delegating it to another employee, even if that employee is competent.

Reasoning

The court’s reasoning focused on the paramount importance of workplace safety. They argued that the employer ultimately bears the responsibility for ensuring a safe working environment. Delegating the task doesn’t absolve them of their ultimate liability if safety protocols are not followed and accidents occur.

Significance

Wilsons and Clyde Coal Co v English holds significant weight in shaping employer liability law. It established the principle of an employer’s non-delegable duty to provide a safe workplace. This case ensures that employers are held accountable for workplace safety, regardless of any delegation of tasks.

Conclusion

Wilsons and Clyde Coal Co v English stands as a landmark case in employer liability law. It emphasizes the paramount importance of workplace safety and the employer’s non-delegable duty to ensure a safe working environment for their employees. The case serves as a reminder that employers are ultimately accountable for the safety of their workforce.

Why Choose Us:

Our law coursework writing service offers comprehensive assistance to students struggling with coursework assignments. With a team of experienced legal scholars and writers, we provide high-quality coursework tailored to the specific requirements of each student, ensuring academic success and peace of mind

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Wilsons and Clyde Co v English' (Mylawtutor.net, September 2012 ) <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/wilsons-and-clyde-co-v-english> accessed 17 April 2024
My, Law, Tutor. (September 2012 ). Wilsons and Clyde Co v English. Retrieved from https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/wilsons-and-clyde-co-v-english
"Wilsons and Clyde Co v English." MyLawTutor.net. 9 2012. All Answers Ltd. 04 2024 <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/wilsons-and-clyde-co-v-english>.
"Wilsons and Clyde Co v English." MyLawTutor. MyLawTutor.net, September 2012. Web. 17 April 2024. <https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/wilsons-and-clyde-co-v-english>.
MyLawTutor. September 2012. Wilsons and Clyde Co v English. [online]. Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/wilsons-and-clyde-co-v-english [Accessed 17 April 2024].
MyLawTutor. Wilsons and Clyde Co v English [Internet]. September 2012. [Accessed 17 April 2024]; Available from: https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/wilsons-and-clyde-co-v-english.
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url=https://www.mylawtutor.net/cases/wilsons-and-clyde-co-v-english |title=Wilsons and Clyde Co v English |publisher=MyLawTutor.net |date=September 2012 |accessdate=17 April 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Dick Bentley v Harold Smith

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to Dick Bentley v Harold Smith The world of contracts can be a complex one, especially when it comes to the interpretation of statements made during negotiations. Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] stands as a significant case in English contract law, offering valuable insights into the distinction between a […]

Performance Cars v Abraham

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to Performance Cars v Abraham Performance Cars Ltd v Abraham (1962) stands as a landmark case in English tort law, specifically regarding the concept of causation in negligence claims. This case study delves into the factual background, the legal issue at stake, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the lasting impact of the case […]

R v Hennessy – 1989

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to R v Hennessy – 1989 The criminal justice system grapples with complex issues when a defendant’s actions seem involuntary due to a medical condition. R v Hennessy (1989) stands as a significant case in English law, delving into the boundaries of the defense of automatism in the context of diabetic hypoglycemia. This case […]

go to top