American Cyanamid v Ethicon

March 11, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s):


American Cyanamid v Ethicon is a seminal case in product liability law, shedding light on the legal obligations of pharmaceutical companies and the principles governing liability for defective products. This case study examines the details of the dispute between American Cyanamid and Ethicon, highlighting its significance in shaping product liability jurisprudence.


American Cyanamid, a major pharmaceutical company, and Ethicon, a subsidiary specializing in medical devices, were involved in the development and marketing of a surgical product intended for medical use. The background of the case revolves around the circumstances leading to the alleged harm caused by the product, triggering legal action by affected parties.

Facts of the Case

The specific facts of American Cyanamid v Ethicon pertain to the development, testing, marketing, and distribution of the surgical product by Ethicon, as well as the injuries or adverse effects reported by individuals who used the product. These facts are crucial in establishing the basis for the legal claims and defenses presented by both parties.

Legal Issues

The primary legal issues in the case center on product liability, negligence, and corporate responsibility. Key questions include whether Ethicon breached its duty of care in designing, manufacturing, or marketing the product, and whether American Cyanamid, as the parent company, could be held liable for the actions of its subsidiary.

Applicable Law

To analyze American Cyanamid v Ethicon effectively, it is necessary to consider the relevant legal framework governing product liability and corporate liability. This includes statutes such as the Uniform Commercial Code, case law precedents related to defective products and negligence claims, and regulatory standards governing pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturing.

Court Proceedings

The court proceedings in American Cyanamid v Ethicon involved hearings where both parties presented their arguments and evidence. Ethicon likely argued that it exercised due diligence in testing and manufacturing the product and that any adverse effects were unforeseeable or attributable to other factors. American Cyanamid, on the other hand, may have contested its liability as a parent company and sought to limit its exposure to damages.

Appellate Process

If dissatisfied with the trial court’s decision, either party may have pursued an appeal, seeking review by a higher court. The appellate court would have examined the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law to determine whether errors were made or if the judgment was supported by the evidence and applicable legal principles.


The final judgment in American Cyanamid v Ethicon would have addressed the legal issues raised in the case and determined the rights and liabilities of the parties. The court’s decision would likely include findings regarding Ethicon’s liability for the defective product, the extent of damages awarded to affected parties, and any rulings on American Cyanamid’s corporate responsibility.

Impact and Significance

American Cyanamid v Ethicon has had a significant impact on product liability law, corporate governance, and consumer protection. The case has influenced industry standards for product testing, marketing, and safety, highlighting the importance of corporate accountability and the duty of care owed to consumers.


In conclusion, American Cyanamid v Ethicon serves as a pivotal case in product liability law, illustrating the complexities of holding pharmaceutical companies accountable for defective products. By examining the background, facts, legal issues, court proceedings, appellate process, decision, and impact of the case, one gains valuable insights into the legal principles governing product liability and corporate responsibility in the healthcare industry.

Why Choose Us:

Seeking guidance for your law dissertation proposal? Our Law Dissertation Proposal Services offer expert assistance in crafting a compelling proposal. We ensure thorough research, clear objectives, and a well-defined methodology tailored to your topic. With our support, you can outline your research aims, justify your approach, and demonstrate the significance of your study. Trust our Law Dissertation Proposal Services to help you lay the groundwork for a successful dissertation, paving the way for academic excellence in your legal studies.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'American Cyanamid v Ethicon' (, September 2012 ) <> accessed 25 April 2024
My, Law, Tutor. (September 2012 ). American Cyanamid v Ethicon. Retrieved from
"American Cyanamid v Ethicon." 9 2012. All Answers Ltd. 04 2024 <>.
"American Cyanamid v Ethicon." MyLawTutor., September 2012. Web. 25 April 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. September 2012. American Cyanamid v Ethicon. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 25 April 2024].
MyLawTutor. American Cyanamid v Ethicon [Internet]. September 2012. [Accessed 25 April 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=American Cyanamid v Ethicon | |date=September 2012 |accessdate=25 April 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Dick Bentley v Harold Smith

. Last modified: April 24, 2024

Introduction to Dick Bentley v Harold Smith The world of contracts can be a complex one, especially when it comes to the interpretation of statements made during negotiations. Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] stands as a significant case in English contract law, offering valuable insights into the distinction between a […]

Performance Cars v Abraham

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to Performance Cars v Abraham Performance Cars Ltd v Abraham (1962) stands as a landmark case in English tort law, specifically regarding the concept of causation in negligence claims. This case study delves into the factual background, the legal issue at stake, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the lasting impact of the case […]

R v Hennessy – 1989

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to R v Hennessy – 1989 The criminal justice system grapples with complex issues when a defendant’s actions seem involuntary due to a medical condition. R v Hennessy (1989) stands as a significant case in English law, delving into the boundaries of the defense of automatism in the context of diabetic hypoglycemia. This case […]

go to top