My Law Tutor

Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl – 1983

January 08, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl: Case Summary

Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl (1983) is a landmark English contract law case that revolves around the formation of a contract through modern communication methods, specifically telex. It clarifies the crucial concept of place of contract formation and its implications for determining which legal jurisdiction applies in international disputes.

Facts of the Case:

  • Brinkibon Ltd, a London-based company, wanted to buy steel from Stahag Stahl, an Austrian company.
  • The negotiation happened solely through telex exchanges, with Brinkibon’s acceptance sent from London to Vienna.
  • When Stahag failed to deliver the steel, Brinkibon sued them in England. However, Stahag argued that the contract was formed in Austria and English courts lacked jurisdiction.


  • Where was the contract formed – in England upon acceptance or in Austria upon receipt of acceptance?
  • Does the traditional “postal rule” (acceptance takes effect when posted) apply to communication via telex, a faster and more immediate technology?
  • Which legal jurisdiction should govern the resolution of the dispute: England or Austria?


The House of Lords, by a majority decision, ruled in favor of Stahag Stahl. They held that:

  • The traditional postal rule, despite its general applicability, was not appropriate for instant communication methods like telex.
  • The contract was formed upon receipt of acceptance in Vienna, making Austrian law applicable.
  • The location of acceptance, not the sender’s location, determines the place of contract formation when faster communication methods are used.

Significance of the Case:

Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl established a precedent for contract formation in the age of rapid technological communication. It:

  • Highlighted the limitations of the postal rule in modern electronic communication contexts.
  • Emphasized the importance of the place of receipt of acceptance as the decisive factor in determining the location of contract formation.
  • Introduced a framework for applying established legal principles to evolving communication technologies.

Elements of Contract Formation:

For a valid contract to exist, certain elements must be present:

  • Offer: A clear and unambiguous offer to enter into a binding agreement.
  • Acceptance: A clear and unconditional acceptance of the offer by the other party.
  • Consideration: Something of value exchanged between the parties (goods, services, money).
  • Intention to Create Legal Relations: Both parties must intend to be legally bound by the agreement.

Applying Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl to Other Cases:

This case has shaped subsequent judicial decisions regarding contract formation in various technological contexts:

  • Electronic mail (email): Applying similar principles, courts consider the time of receipt of an email’s acceptance for determining the place of contract formation.
  • Instant messaging: Legal interpretations surrounding instant messaging agreements often draw parallels to the considerations for telex-based contracts.


Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl remains a vital reference point in international contract law, guiding parties and courts in navigating the legal intricacies of agreements formed through modern communication technologies. It emphasizes the need for flexible interpretations of legal principles to adapt to evolving technological landscapes and ensure clarity and fairness in commercial transactions across borders.

Why Choose Us:

Our English experts meticulously generate innovative English Literature Dissertation Ideas by immersing themselves in diverse literary realms. They explore classic and contemporary literary works, analyzing themes, character developments, and socio-cultural contexts. Leveraging their profound knowledge, they identify unexplored niches, themes, or critical perspectives within literary discourse. Engaging deeply with various genres, historical periods, or cultural movements, our experts craft thought-provoking and original dissertation ideas. They ensure these ideas resonate with academic rigor, offering students a rich array of topics to delve into, inspiring scholarly exploration and insightful research in the field of English Literature.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl – 1983' (, ) <> accessed 24 July 2024
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl – 1983. Retrieved from
"Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl – 1983." . All Answers Ltd. 07 2024 <>.
"Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl – 1983." MyLawTutor., . Web. 24 July 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. . Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl – 1983. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 24 July 2024].
MyLawTutor. Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl – 1983 [Internet]. . [Accessed 24 July 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl – 1983 | |date= |accessdate=24 July 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Cutter v Powell – 1795

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Cutter v Powell – 1795 Cutter v Powell, decided in 1795 by the English Court of King’s Bench, is a landmark case in contract law, dealing with the concept of substantial performance and express contractual terms. The case revolved around a sailor’s claim for wages after his death during a voyage, raising questions […]

Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton – 1913

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

 Introduction to Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton – 1913 Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton, a landmark case from 1913, holds significant importance in the realm of contract law. This case revolves around a dispute between Heilbut, Symons & Co, the plaintiff, and Buckleton, the defendant. It raises fundamental questions regarding the interpretation […]

R v Donovan

UK Law . Last modified: April 8, 2024

Introduction to R v Donovan: R v Donovan stands as a pivotal legal case that delves into the intricacies of criminal liability in the context of communication and freedom of expression. This case, which unfolded within the British legal system, presents a compelling narrative fraught with legal complexities and ethical considerations. This essay aims to […]

Luxor v Cooper – 1941

UK Law . Last modified: July 10, 2024

 Introduction to Luxor v Cooper – 1941 Luxor v Cooper, a notable case from 1941, delved into critical aspects of contract law, marking its significance within legal history. This case revolved around a dispute between Luxor, the plaintiff, and Cooper, the defendant. Set against the backdrop of World War II, this case unfolded in […]

Krell v Henry [1903]

UK Law . Last modified: December 19, 2023

Case Introduction In the legal case of Krell v Henry [1903], two main people were involved: Krell as the person who sued (plaintiff) and Henry as the person being sued (defendant). This case is important because it dealt with certain legal matters that affected how contracts were understood and interpreted. The decisions made in this […]

Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis: In 2005, the House of Lords, the highest court in the United Kingdom, grappled with a pivotal question in Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis. The case, arising from the tragic murder of Stephen Lawrence and the subsequent mishandling of the investigation by […]

go to top