My Law Tutor

Derry v Peek – 1889

December 13, 2023
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Introduction to Derry v Peek – 1889:

Derry v Peek is a significant legal case that involved a dispute regarding the accuracy of information shared by a company before issuing shares to the public. It’s a pivotal case in contract law, particularly regarding misrepresentation. The case arose from statements made by a tramway company regarding their ability to get an act of Parliament. The shareholders alleged that these statements were misleading, causing financial losses. This case study aims to explore the details of Derry v Peek, understanding the legal arguments presented, court rulings, and the impact this case had on contract law.

Background of Derry v Peek Case

The tramway company made public statements claiming they were authorized to act under an Act of Parliament. Later, it was revealed they hadn’t obtained this authorization. Shareholders who relied on the company’s statements sued, alleging fraudulent misrepresentation. The dispute revolved around the accuracy of the information provided by the company. The central legal issue was whether the statements made by the company were false and if they were made fraudulently, leading to reliance by the shareholders.

Legal Principles and Arguments Presented

The shareholders claimed that the tramway company’s statements were misleading, causing them to invest based on false information. The company argued that the statements were made in good faith and were not intentionally misleading. They claimed the shareholders had no right to rely on those statements. The case centered on the legal principle of fraudulent misrepresentation, where false statements were made with the intention to deceive, leading to reliance and subsequent losses.

1. Court Proceedings and Rulings

During the hearings, evidence was presented to determine the accuracy of the company’s statements and whether they were intentionally misleading. The court examined the evidence and ruled in favor of the tramway company, stating that the statements were made in good faith, and the shareholders shouldn’t have relied on them. The court’s ruling established precedent regarding the requirements for proving fraudulent misrepresentation, influencing future cases involving similar claims.

2. Significance and Precedents Set

Derry v Peek set a benchmark in establishing the criteria for proving fraudulent misrepresentation, affecting how such cases are approached and decided. The case set a precedent for proving fraudulent misrepresentation, emphasizing the need for clear evidence of intentional deception. The case’s impact remains significant in guiding legal interpretations in cases concerning misrepresentation and reliance on false statements.

3. Critique and Controversies

Some legal scholars criticized the court’s decision, arguing that it set a high bar for proving fraudulent misrepresentation, potentially making it challenging for claimants. Debates ensued regarding the extent to which companies should be held accountable for statements made before offering shares to the public. Alternative viewpoints focused on balancing the responsibility of companies to provide accurate information without overly burdening them with legal liabilities.

Comparative Analysis

Comparing Derry v Peek with earlier cases highlighted the evolving standards for proving fraudulent misrepresentation and its impact on legal liabilities. Analyzing differences and commonalities in legal interpretations revealed the evolving legal landscape concerning misrepresentation and reliance. The case’s contribution to shaping legal frameworks emphasized the necessity for clear evidence in proving fraudulent misrepresentation.


Summarizing the crucial aspects learned, emphasizing the case’s role in establishing standards for proving fraudulent misrepresentation. Reflecting on the lasting impact of Derry v Peek on legal principles, particularly in cases involving reliance on pre-contractual statements. Encouraging further analysis in contract law, suggesting areas for deeper research regarding misrepresentation and reliance in contractual agreements.

Why choose Us:

Our Law Essay Writing Service stands out for its reliability due to meticulous research, precise legal analysis, and adherence to academic standards. With skilled legal experts, timely delivery, and a commitment to quality, we ensure accurate, comprehensive, and trustworthy essays, earning us a reputation for dependable legal assistance.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Derry v Peek – 1889' (, ) <> accessed 24 July 2024
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). Derry v Peek – 1889. Retrieved from
"Derry v Peek – 1889." . All Answers Ltd. 07 2024 <>.
"Derry v Peek – 1889." MyLawTutor., . Web. 24 July 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. . Derry v Peek – 1889. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 24 July 2024].
MyLawTutor. Derry v Peek – 1889 [Internet]. . [Accessed 24 July 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Derry v Peek – 1889 | |date= |accessdate=24 July 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Harris v Goddard 1983

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Harris v Goddard: Harris v Goddard 1983 is a significant case in legal history, delving into intricate issues in both contract and tort law. This case study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the background, legal issues, arguments, procedural history, analysis, decision, and implications of this landmark litigation. By exploring the complexities […]

Pinnel’s Case – 1602

UK Law . Last modified: January 5, 2024

Introduction to the Legal Case Summary The Legal Case Summary serves as a distilled version of a specific legal case, designed to provide a comprehensive yet condensed overview. It aims to present the case’s essential components, including pivotal events, core legal issues, and significant outcomes, all in a simplified manner. This summary acts as a […]

Hutton v Warren – 1836

UK Law . Last modified: March 7, 2024

Introduction to Hutton v Warren: Hutton v Warren – 1836 stands as a cornerstone in legal jurisprudence, addressing intricate issues in both contract and tort law. This case study aims to dissect the background, legal nuances, arguments, procedural history, analysis, decision, and repercussions of this landmark litigation. Through an in-depth exploration, we unveil the complexities […]

Revill v Newbery – 1996

UK Law . Last modified: July 10, 2024

 Introduction to Revill v Newbery – 1996 Revill v Newbery is a crucial legal case concerning negligence in tort law. This case revolves around an incident involving Mr. Revill and Mr. Newbery, which led to a legal dispute over negligence. It’s a significant case because it helps to understand how the law addresses situations […]

Collins v Wilcock – 1984

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Collins v Wilcock – 1984 Collins v Wilcock is a legal case that stemmed from an encounter between Mary Collins, a police officer, and Wilma Wilcock, who was accused by Collins of soliciting in a public street. The situation escalated when Collins attempted to arrest Wilcock based on suspicion, but Wilcock vehemently denied […]

Hunter v Canary Wharf

UK Law . Last modified: December 26, 2023

Introduction to Hunter v Canary Wharf: The Hunter v Canary Wharf case carries significant weight within property law discussions. This legal dispute involved Mr. Hunter and the Canary Wharf Group and brought to light critical matters regarding property rights and what constitutes interference with those rights. The case gained prominence due to its implications in […]

go to top