My Law Tutor

Storer v MCC 1974

March 05, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Introduction to Storer v MCC:

The 1974 case of Storer v MCC, decided by the Court of Appeal, stands as a pivotal decision in English contract law, addressing the validity of agreements with unsigned documents and incomplete terms. The case centered around Mr. Storer’s claim that a contract existed for him to purchase a property from the Manchester City Council (MCC), despite the absence of a signed agreement and outstanding details like the purchase price and possession date.

Facts of the Case

Mr. Storer expressed interest in buying a council-owned property. MCC provided a draft agreement outlining the main terms like price range and mortgage assistance. Mr. Storer returned the draft with his details filled in but never formally signed it. Both parties instructed solicitors to proceed, assuming a finalized agreement existed. However, MCC later decided to back out due to potential development value of the land. Mr. Storer sued for specific performance, arguing a binding contract existed.

Legal Issue

The central legal question revolved around the existence of a contract:

  • Did the exchange of documents, unsigned agreement, and incomplete terms constitute a binding contract between Mr. Storer and MCC, despite the absence of a finalized and signed agreement?

Contract Formation Analysis

Analyzing the elements of contract formation:

  • Offer: Arguably, the draft agreement served as MCC’s offer, outlining key terms.
  • Acceptance: Mr. Storer returning the form with his details could be interpreted as acceptance.
  • Consideration: Both parties instructed solicitors, potentially demonstrating mutual exchange and detriment supporting a contract.
  • Outstanding terms: The unsigned status and unfinalized aspects like price and possession date raised questions about a “meeting of minds” and complete agreement.

Legal Principles and Doctrines

Relevant legal principles:

  • Battle of forms: Both sides used forms, with Mr. Storer not explicitly accepting all MCC’s terms.
  • Incorporation by reference: Could unsigned documents like the draft be incorporated into the contract?
  • Estoppel: Did either party’s conduct (e.g., instructing solicitors) prevent them from denying a contract existed?

Judgment and Rationale

The Court of Appeal found a contract existed:

  • They emphasized the parties’ conduct and intention, stating that formalities like signed documents weren’t decisive.
  • MCC’s actions in preparing the draft, accepting Mr. Storer’s response, and instructing solicitors indicated their agreement to the essential terms.
  • Incomplete terms like price and possession date were deemed administrative details to be finalized later, not preventing a binding contract.

Impact of the Case

The decision had a significant impact:

  • Emphasized the importance of considering actual conduct and intention when assessing contract formation, beyond rigid formalities.
  • Clarified the potential application of “incorporation by reference” for unsigned documents under specific circumstances.
  • Recognized the limitations of the “battle of forms” doctrine where conduct suggests mutual agreement despite differing forms.

Conclusion: Storer v MCC highlights the nuanced process of contract formation, reminding us that formalities like signatures may not always be determinative. By focusing on conduct, intention, and the overall context, the court provided a framework for assessing agreements even when some formalities or terms remain outstanding. This case continues to influence contract law, urging careful consideration of all aspects involved in establishing a binding agreement.

Why Choose Us: Embark on a journey of academic excellence with our Law Essay Writing Services. Meticulously crafted by seasoned legal professionals and proficient writers, our essays exemplify a deep understanding of legal nuances. We blend legal expertise with articulate writing, delivering essays that not only meet stringent academic criteria but also showcase mastery in legal concepts. Trust us for essays that transcend conventional standards, offering a unique blend of legal insight and compelling narrative. Elevate your academic standing with our Law Essay Writing Services, where quality, originality, and punctuality converge for a superior essay-writing experience.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Storer v MCC 1974' (, ) <> accessed 24 July 2024
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). Storer v MCC 1974. Retrieved from
"Storer v MCC 1974." . All Answers Ltd. 07 2024 <>.
"Storer v MCC 1974." MyLawTutor., . Web. 24 July 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. . Storer v MCC 1974. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 24 July 2024].
MyLawTutor. Storer v MCC 1974 [Internet]. . [Accessed 24 July 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Storer v MCC 1974 | |date= |accessdate=24 July 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Davis v Johnson

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Davis v Johnson: Davis v Johnson is a significant case that sheds light on key legal principles within contract law. This case involves a dispute between two parties, Davis and Johnson, over contractual obligations, presenting an opportunity to examine the complexities of contract formation and enforcement. Background The case of Davis v Johnson […]

Barrett v Ministry of Defence

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Barrett v Ministry of Defence: Barrett v Ministry of Defence is a notable case that exemplifies the application of tort law principles, particularly negligence, in cases involving government entities. This case holds significance in legal jurisprudence for its examination of duty of care owed by governmental organizations to individuals affected by their actions. […]

Imperial Chemical Industries v Shatwell

UK Law . Last modified: March 26, 2024

Introduction to Imperial Chemical Industries v Shatwell: The quest for a safe work environment is a constant tension between employer responsibility and employee conduct. The landmark case of Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 exemplifies this tension, shaping the legal landscape of employer liability for employee injuries arising from disregarding safety protocols. […]

Jaggard v Dickinson – 1981

UK Law . Last modified: March 8, 2024

Introduction to Jaggard v Dickinson – 1981: Jaggard v Dickinson is a notable legal case that holds significance in the realm of property law. Heard in the Court of Appeal in 1981, this case involved complex legal issues surrounding the sale of property and the obligations of sellers to disclose material facts to buyers. The […]

Luxor v Cooper – 1941

UK Law . Last modified: July 10, 2024

 Introduction to Luxor v Cooper – 1941 Luxor v Cooper, a notable case from 1941, delved into critical aspects of contract law, marking its significance within legal history. This case revolved around a dispute between Luxor, the plaintiff, and Cooper, the defendant. Set against the backdrop of World War II, this case unfolded in […]

Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2)

UK Law . Last modified: March 5, 2024

Introduction to Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2) This landmark case, also known as “The Wives’ Cases”, dealt with the complex legal issue of undue influence in contracts, specifically involving spouses and guarantees for loans. The House of Lords examined whether wives were pressured into guaranteeing their husbands’ loans, potentially rendering the agreements […]

go to top