My Law Tutor

Howard Marine v Ogden – 1978 QB 574

March 07, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Introduction to Howard Marine v Ogden:

Howard Marine v Ogden – 1978 QB 574 is a seminal case in legal jurisprudence, addressing both contract and tort law principles. This case study delves into the background, legal issues, arguments presented, procedural history, analysis, decision, and implications of this significant litigation. By examining the intricacies of contractual obligations and potential tortious conduct, we gain valuable insights into the complexities of these legal domains and their interplay in civil disputes.


Howard Marine initiated legal proceedings against Ogden, alleging breaches of contract or tortious conduct. The dispute stemmed from a business transaction between the parties, where Howard Marine claimed that Ogden failed to fulfill contractual obligations or engaged in actions constituting torts. The circumstances leading to the litigation highlight the importance of contractual clarity and adherence to legal duties in business relationships.

Legal Issues:

The primary legal issues in Howard Marine v Ogden revolve around breaches of contract and potential tort claims. Howard Marine contends that Ogden breached contractual obligations, while also asserting tort claims, such as negligence or misrepresentation. The central question in this case is whether Ogden’s actions constituted breaches of contract or tortious conduct, and if so, what remedies are available to Howard Marine.

Arguments Presented:

Howard Marine presents arguments alleging breaches of contract, citing specific contractual provisions and instances where Ogden purportedly failed to fulfill obligations. Additionally, Howard Marine asserts tort claims, arguing that Ogden’s actions caused harm and were negligent or involved misrepresentation. In response, Ogden challenges Howard Marine’s interpretation of the contract and denies any tortious conduct, presenting evidence to support their position.

Procedural History:

The trial court proceedings in Howard Marine v Ogden involved the presentation of evidence, legal arguments, and testimony from witnesses to establish the facts of the case and assess liability. Following deliberation, the trial court rendered a verdict, ruling in favor of either party or determining liability for specific claims. Subsequently, any appeals filed led to further review by appellate courts, shaping the legal precedent in the case.


The analysis of Howard Marine v Ogden centers on the application of legal principles governing contract and tort law. The court examines the terms of the contract, the parties’ conduct, and relevant statutes and case law to determine whether breaches occurred. Additionally, the court assesses the elements of tort claims, including duty, breach, causation, and damages, to evaluate the viability of Howard Marine’s tort claims against Ogden.


Ultimately, the court renders a decision in Howard Marine v Ogden, either finding in favor of Howard Marine, Ogden, or apportioning liability based on the merits of each claim presented. The court’s decision reflects its interpretation of contractual obligations and potential tortious conduct in light of legal standards and precedent, shaping the outcome of the case and influencing future litigation in similar matters.

Implications and Significance:

Howard Marine v Ogden carries significant implications for contract and tort law, underscoring the importance of contractual clarity, adherence to legal duties, and accountability for tortious conduct. By clarifying legal standards and remedies available to parties in civil disputes, the case provides guidance for navigating complex legal issues arising from business transactions and interpersonal relationships. Moreover, the case serves as a precedent for resolving similar disputes, informing legal practice and shaping the development of contract and tort law jurisprudence.


In conclusion, Howard Marine v Ogden represents a multifaceted exploration of contract and tort law principles, offering valuable insights into legal obligations and remedies available to parties in civil disputes. Through a comprehensive examination of the background, legal issues, arguments presented, procedural history, analysis, decision, and implications of this case, we gain a deeper understanding of the complexities of contract and tort law and their intersection in legal practice. Ultimately, Howard Marine v Ogden serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding legal duties and seeking redress for breaches of contract and tortious conduct in civil disputes.

Why Choose Us:

Our Professional Law Assignment Helpers offer expert guidance and assistance to students navigating complex legal concepts and assignments. With their in-depth knowledge and experience, they provide tailored support to ensure high-quality, well-researched assignments that meet academic standards and requirements.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Howard Marine v Ogden – 1978 QB 574' (, ) <> accessed 24 July 2024
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). Howard Marine v Ogden – 1978 QB 574. Retrieved from
"Howard Marine v Ogden – 1978 QB 574." . All Answers Ltd. 07 2024 <>.
"Howard Marine v Ogden – 1978 QB 574." MyLawTutor., . Web. 24 July 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. . Howard Marine v Ogden – 1978 QB 574. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 24 July 2024].
MyLawTutor. Howard Marine v Ogden – 1978 QB 574 [Internet]. . [Accessed 24 July 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Howard Marine v Ogden – 1978 QB 574 | |date= |accessdate=24 July 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

R v Ryan – 1996

UK Law . Last modified: April 2, 2024

Introduction to R v Ryan – 1996 R v Ryan – 1996 is a notable case in legal jurisprudence, characterized by its significance in criminal law proceedings. This case study provides a comprehensive analysis of the background, facts, legal issues, court proceedings, precedent, and broader implications of R v Ryan – 1996. Background The case […]

Oscar Chess v Williams – 1957

UK Law . Last modified: January 22, 2024

Introduction to Oscar Chess v Williams – 1957 The bustling streets of London in 1957 were home to many a deal, but none as questionable as the one struck between Oscar Chess Ltd., a seasoned car dealer, and Mr. Williams, a private seller. In the heart of the automotive scene, a Morris car changed hands, […]

Spurling v Bradshaw – 1956

UK Law . Last modified: February 26, 2024

Introduction to Spurling v Bradshaw – 1956 In 1956, the English Court of Appeal delivered a landmark judgement in Spurling v Bradshaw, significantly impacting the legal landscape around exclusion clauses and bailment. The case centered around a London warehouse company, J Spurling Ltd, and a customer, Mr. Andrew Bradshaw, who entrusted them with storing his […]

Bernstein v Skyviews – 1978

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Bernstein v Skyviews: Bernstein v Skyviews – 1978 remains a pivotal case in property law, particularly regarding aerial photography and privacy rights. This case involved a dispute between Bernstein, the plaintiff, and Skyviews, the defendant, over the unauthorized aerial photography of Bernstein’s property. It raised significant questions about property rights and the limits […]

Duty of Care Test in Caparo v Dickman

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Caparo v Dickman Caparo Industries plc v Dickman is a significant case that shaped negligence law in the United Kingdom. This legal dispute involved Caparo Industries, an investment company, suing its auditors, Dickman, for alleged negligence. The core of this case was establishing the existence of a duty of care between Caparo Industries […]

Eves v Eves – 1975

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Eves v Eves – 1975 Eves v Eves – 1975 is a notable case in family law, shedding light on property disputes and marital rights during the mid-20th century. This case study delves into the intricate dynamics between the parties, legal issues raised, court proceedings, and implications for family law jurisprudence. Background In […]

go to top