My Law Tutor

R v Howe – 1987

April 01, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Introduction to R v Howe – 1987

The landmark case of R v Howe, decided by the House of Lords in 1987, remains a significant precedent in English and Welsh criminal law. It dealt with the defense of duress in the context of murder.


The case involved two sets of appellants. Howe and Bannister, along with a third individual named Murray, were charged with two murders and conspiracy to murder. The victims were subjected to brutal violence and torture before being killed. The defense for Howe and Bannister rested on the claim of duress. They alleged that a violent individual known only as “M” coerced them into participating in the crimes by threatening their lives and the lives of their families.


The central legal question before the House of Lords was whether duress could be a valid defense to a charge of murder.


The House of Lords delivered a clear judgment. Duress, they ruled, was not a defense to murder. This applied not only to the person who directly caused the death (the principal in the first degree) but also to anyone who participated as a principal in the second degree (those who actively assisted in the murder).


The court’s reasoning focused on the gravity of murder. They argued that the sanctity of human life is paramount, and no threat, however serious, could justify taking another person’s life. The decision acknowledged that duress can be a valid defense for lesser offenses. However, for the most serious crime of murder, the court distinguished between the core act of killing and minor participation under duress. If someone, under duress, played a minor role (e.g., holding a victim), the charge might be reduced to manslaughter. However, directly causing the death or actively assisting in the murder could never be excused by duress.


R v Howe is a cornerstone case in the law of duress. It established a clear boundary for the defense. Duress cannot be used to justify the most serious crime of murder. This decision has provided legal clarity and consistency in prosecuting murder cases where the accused claims coercion.

Additional Considerations

Subsequent cases, such as R v Hasan [2005], have reaffirmed the principles established in R v Howe. However, some legal scholars argue that the decision might be too rigid. They propose a more nuanced approach, considering the nature of the threat, the imminence of danger, and the availability of escape routes when evaluating a duress defense in murder cases.


R v Howe remains a vital case in English and Welsh criminal law. It clarifies the limited scope of the duress defense, ensuring that the gravity of murder is upheld. While discussions around the absolute nature of the decision continue, the case stands as a strong statement on the importance of protecting human life.

Why Choose Us:

Our law coursework help online platform facilitates seamless access to expert assistance for students worldwide. Through interactive online sessions, personalized feedback, and 24/7 support, we ensure that students receive timely guidance and support, irrespective of their geographical location or time zone.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'R v Howe – 1987' (, ) <> accessed 24 July 2024
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). R v Howe – 1987. Retrieved from
"R v Howe – 1987." . All Answers Ltd. 07 2024 <>.
"R v Howe – 1987." MyLawTutor., . Web. 24 July 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. . R v Howe – 1987. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 24 July 2024].
MyLawTutor. R v Howe – 1987 [Internet]. . [Accessed 24 July 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=R v Howe – 1987 | |date= |accessdate=24 July 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Pilcher v Rawlins

UK Law . Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to Pilcher v Rawlins In the annals of legal history, Pilcher v Rawlins holds a significant place, representing a pivotal moment in the evolution of legal principles. This case study endeavors to dissect its intricacies, shedding light on its contextual background, the legal issues it entailed, and its enduring impact on legal jurisprudence. Background […]

Page v Smith – 1996

UK Law . Last modified: December 11, 2023

Introduction to Page v Smith Case: The Page v Smith case, originating from a car accident in 1996, brought to light crucial legal considerations regarding negligence and its impact on pre-existing health conditions. This landmark case pivoted on the intricate intersection of negligence law and psychiatric harm, particularly concerning the exacerbation of pre-existing health conditions […]

American Cyanamid v Ethicon

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to American Cyanamid v Ethicon: American Cyanamid v Ethicon is a seminal case in product liability law, shedding light on the legal obligations of pharmaceutical companies and the principles governing liability for defective products. This case study examines the details of the dispute between American Cyanamid and Ethicon, highlighting its significance in shaping product […]

Mullin v Richards 1998

UK Law . Last modified: January 8, 2024

Introduction to Mullin v Richards 1998 Mullin v Richards 1998 stands as a significant legal case that centers on contract law and the interpretation of contractual obligations. This case emerged due to a dispute between Mr. Mullin, the plaintiff, and Mr. Richards, the defendant, concerning a contractual agreement related to property. It gained prominence for […]

Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Ltd

UK Law . Last modified: March 7, 2024

Introduction to Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Ltd: The journey of “Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co Ltd” through the UK legal system brought to the forefront the nuanced debate over the nature of injury and damage within the context of occupational health. At issue was whether pleural plaques—areas of fibrosis in the lung caused […]

Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers – 2004

UK Law . Last modified: July 20, 2024

Introduction to Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers: In 2004, the legal world witnessed a landmark case that encapsulated the intricate balance between press freedom and individual privacy rights. “Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers” pitted supermodel Naomi Campbell against Mirror Group Newspapers over an article that shook the foundations of media ethics and privacy law in […]

go to top