Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking – 1971

January 11, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s):

Introduction to Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking – 1971

The legal case of Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking, which took place in 1971, revolves around a dispute involving parking fees and the treatment of customers who lost their tickets at the parking garage. This case is important as it delves into the dynamics of consumer rights and the obligations of service providers, shedding light on how courts address such conflicts. Understanding this case assists in comprehending legal principles governing contracts and consumer protections, making it a noteworthy example for legal studies and consumer rights advocacy.


The background of Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking reveals the events that triggered the dispute. Mr. Thornton, a customer at Shoe Lane Parking, parked his vehicle and received a ticket upon entry. Unfortunately, he misplaced his ticket when attempting to leave. Upon exit, Shoe Lane Parking demanded a higher fee from Thornton due to the lost ticket. Thornton contested this additional charge, leading to a disagreement between the customer and the parking garage, ultimately escalating to a legal case.

Legal Issue

At the heart of the Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking case was the legal issue of whether Shoe Lane Parking was entitled to levy an increased fee on Mr. Thornton due to his lost ticket. The primary concern was whether the parking garage had a lawful basis to demand additional payment when a customer couldn’t present their parking ticket upon exit. The case centered on the interpretation of contractual obligations and fairness in customer relations within such service agreements.

Court Proceedings

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking proceeded to court where both parties presented their arguments. Mr. Thornton argued that the extra charge imposed by Shoe Lane Parking was unjustifiable and constituted an unfair business practice. Conversely, Shoe Lane Parking defended its right to levy the supplementary fee as part of its standard operational procedure in such situations. The court meticulously examined the arguments and evidence presented by both sides.

Judgment and Ruling

Following a comprehensive review of the evidence and legal arguments, the court rendered its decision in favor of Mr. Thornton. The court ruled that Shoe Lane Parking’s imposition of an additional fee due to the lost ticket was unwarranted and unfair to the customer. The judgment set a precedent regarding the treatment of customers who lose their parking tickets and the justifiability of imposing extra charges in such circumstances.

Precedent and Impact

The outcome of Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking established a significant legal precedent. It delineated the obligation of parking garages and similar service providers to exercise fairness and reasonableness in dealing with customers who lose their tickets. This precedent influenced subsequent cases and guided legal interpretations regarding additional charges in similar circumstances, safeguarding the rights of consumers in service contracts.

Analysis and Critique

The court’s decision garnered mixed opinions among legal experts and stakeholders. Some supported the ruling, highlighting the importance of protecting consumers from unjustifiable charges and upholding fairness in commercial dealings. Others raised concerns about the practical implications and potential economic impact on service providers, advocating for a balanced approach considering the interests of both businesses and consumers.

Legacy and Relevance

Despite occurring several decades ago, Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking remains relevant in contemporary legal discourse. Its enduring relevance lies in its establishment of a standard for fair and reasonable treatment of customers in similar commercial contexts. This case’s legacy persists, guiding business practices and legal interpretations concerning lost tickets and additional charges, ensuring fairness and reasonable treatment for consumers.


In conclusion, Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking exemplifies the courts’ role in safeguarding consumer rights and ensuring fairness in contractual dealings. The case’s impact extends beyond its time, serving as a guiding precedent for businesses and courts alike, emphasizing fairness and reasonableness in dealing with customers who encounter such situations. This landmark case continues to influence legal interpretations and practices, advocating for fair treatment and reasonable obligations in service contracts, benefitting consumers and businesses alike.

Why Choose Us:

Our Law Coursework Writing service embodies professionalism through meticulous research, adherence to academic standards, and a comprehensive understanding of legal concepts. Our adept team ensures precise and accurate coursework, aligning with the highest standards of legal academia, and guaranteeing scholarly excellence and professionalism in every written piece.

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking – 1971' (, September 2012 ) <> accessed 25 April 2024
My, Law, Tutor. (September 2012 ). Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking – 1971. Retrieved from
"Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking – 1971." 9 2012. All Answers Ltd. 04 2024 <>.
"Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking – 1971." MyLawTutor., September 2012. Web. 25 April 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. September 2012. Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking – 1971. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 25 April 2024].
MyLawTutor. Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking – 1971 [Internet]. September 2012. [Accessed 25 April 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking – 1971 | |date=September 2012 |accessdate=25 April 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

Dick Bentley v Harold Smith

. Last modified: April 24, 2024

Introduction to Dick Bentley v Harold Smith The world of contracts can be a complex one, especially when it comes to the interpretation of statements made during negotiations. Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] stands as a significant case in English contract law, offering valuable insights into the distinction between a […]

Performance Cars v Abraham

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to Performance Cars v Abraham Performance Cars Ltd v Abraham (1962) stands as a landmark case in English tort law, specifically regarding the concept of causation in negligence claims. This case study delves into the factual background, the legal issue at stake, the court’s decision and reasoning, and the lasting impact of the case […]

R v Hennessy – 1989

. Last modified: April 15, 2024

Introduction to R v Hennessy – 1989 The criminal justice system grapples with complex issues when a defendant’s actions seem involuntary due to a medical condition. R v Hennessy (1989) stands as a significant case in English law, delving into the boundaries of the defense of automatism in the context of diabetic hypoglycemia. This case […]

go to top