My Law Tutor

White v Bluett – 1853

January 16, 2024
Micheal James

Jurisdiction / Tag(s): UK Law

Case Summary:

White v Bluett (1853) is a cornerstone case in English contract law, exploring the concept of consideration and its essentiality for forming a binding agreement. It challenges the notion of promises without tangible benefit being enforceable contracts.

Facts of the Case:

  • Mr. Bluett borrowed money from his son, Mr. Young Bluett, and signed a promissory note acknowledging the debt.
  • Before Mr. Bluett’s death, he orally promised Mr. Young Bluett that he wouldn’t have to repay the debt if he stopped complaining about the inheritance distribution among siblings.
  • Mr. Young Bluett ceased complaining, but after Mr. Bluett’s death, the executor (Mr. White) demanded repayment of the debt.
  • Mr. Young Bluett argued that his father’s promise not to enforce the debt constituted a valid agreement based on his act of stopping complaints.


  • Did Mr. Young Bluett’s act of ceasing complaints constitute sufficient consideration for the contract, making his father’s promise to waive the debt legally binding?
  • Can promises unsupported by tangible benefit, such as refraining from actions one has a right to do, be enforceable contracts?
  • Is there a minimum threshold of value required for consideration to be deemed valid in forming a contract?


The Court of the Exchequer Chamber, by a majority decision, ruled in favor of Mr. White. They held that:

  • Mr. Young Bluett’s act of stopping complaints did not constitute valid consideration because he had no legal right to complain in the first place.
  • The inheritance distribution was solely within Mr. Bluett Sr.’s discretion, and Mr. Young Bluett had no legitimate claim to challenge it.
  • A promise unsupported by valid consideration, however seemingly moral or appealing, cannot be enforced as a binding contract.

Significance of the Case:

White v Bluett established a critical principle in contract law: promises alone, without valuable consideration, do not hold legal weight. It:

  • Reinforced the requirement for a reciprocal exchange of something of value (money, service, benefit) for a contract to be valid.
  • Clarified that actions performed out of moral duty or pre-existing obligation cannot substitute for genuine consideration.
  • Served as a landmark case in upholding the principle of certainty and predictability in contract formation.

Elements of Consideration:

For a contract to be enforceable, it must have valid consideration. Consideration can be:

  • Something of value: Money, goods, services, or any tangible benefit exchanged between the parties.
  • Detriment to the promisee: The act of doing something or refraining from doing something at the promisor’s request.
  • Legal: The act or benefit must be lawful and not contrary to public policy.

Applying White v Bluett to Other Cases:

This case has been cited and distinguished in subsequent rulings regarding consideration in diverse contract scenarios:

  • Cases involving promises to settle existing debts often consider whether the settlement agreement offers any additional benefit beyond extinguishing the existing obligation.
  • Agreements based on promises of future gifts or inheritances are frequently scrutinized for the presence of valid consideration, as mere expectation might not suffice.
  • The case continues to influence legal debates about the boundaries of consideration in specific situations, such as agreements based on moral obligations or promises to perform public duties.


White v Bluett remains a pivotal case in English contract law, emphasizing the importance of consideration in forming enforceable agreements. It reminds us that promises, while morally binding, require a tangible exchange of value to become legally enforceable contracts. This principle contributes to clarity, fairness, and predictability in contractual relationships.

Why Choose Us:

Struggling with crafting persuasive legal proposals? Ditch the writer’s block and boost your grades with our Online Law Proposal Writing Help! We provide expert guidance, from identifying strong legal arguments to structuring your text for maximum impact. No more scrambling to meet deadlines – our experienced legal professionals will polish your proposal to shine, giving you the confidence to impress professors and secure those coveted internships. Get personalized feedback, learn valuable writing skills, and unlock your full potential – all while saving valuable time. Focus on your studies, not proposal stress – choose our Online Law Proposal Writing Help today!

Cite This Work

Select a referencing style to export a reference for this article:

All Answers ltd, 'White v Bluett – 1853' (, ) <> accessed 24 July 2024
My, Law, Tutor. ( ). White v Bluett – 1853. Retrieved from
"White v Bluett – 1853." . All Answers Ltd. 07 2024 <>.
"White v Bluett – 1853." MyLawTutor., . Web. 24 July 2024. <>.
MyLawTutor. . White v Bluett – 1853. [online]. Available from: [Accessed 24 July 2024].
MyLawTutor. White v Bluett – 1853 [Internet]. . [Accessed 24 July 2024]; Available from:
<ref>{{cite web|last=Tutor |first=MyLaw |url= |title=White v Bluett – 1853 | |date= |accessdate=24 July 2024 |location=UK, USA}}</ref>

Related Cases

R v Franklin – 1883

UK Law . Last modified: January 22, 2024

Introduction to R v Franklin – 1883 In the annals of legal history, R v Franklin – 1883 stands as a pivotal case that warrants careful examination. This introduction provides a comprehensive overview, delving into the historical context and significance of the case while identifying the key parties involved. As we journey back to the […]

R v Lipman – 1970

UK Law . Last modified: July 10, 2024

 Introduction to R v Lipman – 1970 The 1970 case of R v Lipman holds a significant position in English criminal law. It grapples with the complex interaction between intoxication, criminal intent (mens rea), and the boundaries of criminal liability. The case revolves around a tragic incident involving a man under the influence of […]

Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Ltd

UK Law . Last modified: March 7, 2024

Introduction to Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Ltd: The journey of “Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co Ltd” through the UK legal system brought to the forefront the nuanced debate over the nature of injury and damage within the context of occupational health. At issue was whether pleural plaques—areas of fibrosis in the lung caused […]

Lowery v Walker – 1911

UK Law . Last modified: March 19, 2024

Introduction to Lowery v Walker: Lowery v Walker (1911) is a seminal case that delves into the complexities of property law, particularly in relation to the principles of adverse possession. This case study aims to dissect the intricacies of Lowery v Walker, exploring its background, legal issues, court proceedings, judgment, impact, controversies, and significance within […]

Thomas v Sorrell [1673]

UK Law . Last modified: July 10, 2024

 Introduction to Thomas v Sorrell: In the annals of legal history, Thomas v Sorrell [1673] occupies a significant place, representing a pivotal moment in the evolution of legal principles. This case study aims to unravel its intricacies, shedding light on its historical context, the legal issues it entailed, and its lasting impact on legal […]

R v Ghosh – 1982

UK Law . Last modified: July 10, 2024

 Introduction to R v Ghosh: R v Ghosh (1982) stands as a seminal case within the annals of criminal law, its significance reverberating through legal precedents and judicial interpretation. This case study aims to dissect its intricacies, delving into its background, procedural history, legal analysis, and lasting impact. Background At its core, R v […]

go to top